Pablo Cuevas vs Danilo Petrovic — Salzburg CH Round of 16

Salzburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
URU2
Pablo Cuevas
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 July 2021
clay
SRB
Danilo Petrovic
34 yrs · 203 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Cuevas P.
6-1 6-4
Petrovic D.
Cuevas P.
662
Petrovic D.
140

Pablo Cuevas defeated Danilo Petrovic 6-1 6-4 in the Salzburg CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cuevas P.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Petrovic D.

Petrovic D.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Cuevas P.

Serve advantage — Cuevas P.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cuevas P.Petrovic D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
42%
Service points won·Even
62%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
34%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.8
5.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.5
4.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (76 vs 27). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cuevas P.Petrovic D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
10
Break points saved·Clear edge
93
77
Break points won·Clear edge
32
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
5
Tiebreaks·Dominant
44
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cuevas P.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Petrovic D.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.4
Surface form
3.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
9.0
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Bagnis F.[4]
Coria F.[3]
6-43-66-2
Semi-finals
Coria F.[3]
Londero J.
6-16-4
Bagnis F.[4]
Jarry N.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Londero J.
Cuevas P.[2]
6-36-0
Coria F.[3]
Rola B.
6-27-65
Bagnis F.[4]
Dzumhur D.
6-16-2
Jarry N.
Lehecka J.
7-666-4
R16
Cuevas P.[2]
Petrovic D.
6-16-4
Londero J.
Vatutin A.
6-02-66-0
Coria F.[3]
Huesler M.
6-14-66-4
Rola B.
Carballes Baena R.[5]
5-76-27-64
Dzumhur D.
Taberner C.[8]
7-626-756-2
Lehecka J.
Muller A.
6-26-4
Jarry N.
Heller P.
6-26-4
Bagnis F.[4]
Gaston H.
6-46-1
R32
Londero J.
Daniel T.[6]
6-46-4
Coria F.[3]
Melzer G.
6-36-4
Huesler M.
Rosol L.
6-36-4
Rola B.
Novak D.
7-57-64
Carballes Baena R.[5]
Neuchrist M.
6-44-66-4
Taberner C.[8]
Viola M.
6-46-4
Dzumhur D.
Mena F.
6-46-0
Gaston H.
Bachinger M.
6-46-3
Bagnis F.[4]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-36-2
Muller A.
Galan D.[7]
7-57-63
Lehecka J.
Aichhorn J.
6-46-3
Heller P.
Cerundolo F.
6-33-66-3
Petrovic D.
Gulbis E.
6-27-64
Vatutin A.
Erler A.
2-66-46-2
Cuevas P.[2]
Yevseyev D.
7-56-3
Jarry N.
Monteiro T.[1]
6-727-647-64