Salvatore Caruso vs Luca Vanni — Perugia CH Round of 32

Perugia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA1
Salvatore Caruso
33 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 July 2021
clay
ITA
Luca Vanni
41 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLLW
Caruso S.
7-6 6-4
Vanni L.
Caruso S.
7762
Vanni L.
6540

Salvatore Caruso defeated Luca Vanni 7-6 6-4 in the Perugia CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Salvatore Caruso came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Salvatore Caruso extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-02-05SofiaQ1hardSalvatore Caruso7-6(2) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Caruso S.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Vanni L.

Vanni L.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Caruso S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Caruso S.Vanni L.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
46%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
51%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.2
4.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (154 vs 22). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Caruso S.Vanni L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
41
17
Break points saved·Clear edge
65
81
Break points won·Dominant
30
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
31
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
18
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Caruso S.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Vanni L.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.5
Surface form
4.5
0.0Lost last 8
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
8.9
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
3.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Etcheverry T.[7]
Sachko V.
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Etcheverry T.[7]
Caruso S.[1]
7-55-76-2
Sachko V.
Serdarusic N.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Etcheverry T.[7]
Fatic N.
6-36-1
Sachko V.
Rune H.
6-37-64
Serdarusic N.
Skatov T.
6-766-46-4
Caruso S.[1]
Cobolli F.
6-43-66-3
R16
Sachko V.
Moroni G.
7-54-66-4
Cobolli F.
Baldi F.
6-27-63
Rune H.
Klein L.
6-46-4
Serdarusic N.
Zhang Z.[4]
7-666-4
Skatov T.
Olivo R.[8]
7-57-5
Etcheverry T.[7]
Stricker D.
7-56-4
Fatic N.
Kuzmanov D.
6-47-65
Caruso S.[1]
Forti F.
6-46-4
R32
Klein L.
Bonadio R.
6-17-64
Rune H.
Fabbiano T.[5]
6-14-66-2
Zhang Z.[4]
Passaro F.
3-66-36-2
Serdarusic N.
Pellegrino A.
6-36-3
Skatov T.
Giustino L.
1-67-656-0
Fatic N.
Cachin P.
6-47-65
Kuzmanov D.
Gaio F.[3]
2-66-37-62
Cobolli F.
Popko D.[6]
2-67-57-63
Forti F.
Collarini A.
4-67-56-1
Caruso S.[1]
Vanni L.
7-656-4
Sachko V.
Martin A.[2]
6-33-66-2
Moroni G.
Furness E.
2-0
Baldi F.
Borges N.
3-63-5
Olivo R.[8]
Zeppieri G.
6-757-56-2
Etcheverry T.[7]
Arnaboldi A.
7-636-2
Stricker D.
Maden Y.
7-636-1