Nerman Fatic vs Pedro Cachin — Perugia CH Round of 32

Perugia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 July 2021
clay
ARG
Pedro Cachin
#1328ATP
31 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
Fatic N.
6-4 7-6
Cachin P.
Fatic N.
6772
Cachin P.
4650

Nerman Fatic defeated Pedro Cachin 6-4 7-6 in the Perugia CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Cachin P.

Cachin P.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Cachin P.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.1
4.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fatic N.Cachin P.
Clutch Rating·Even
24
22
Break points saved·Clear edge
63
77
Break points won·Clear edge
36
21
Deciding sets·Clear edge
24
11
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
35
46

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fatic N.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Cachin P.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
5.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
6.9
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Etcheverry T.[7]
Sachko V.
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Etcheverry T.[7]
Caruso S.[1]
7-55-76-2
Sachko V.
Serdarusic N.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Etcheverry T.[7]
Fatic N.
6-36-1
Sachko V.
Rune H.
6-37-64
Serdarusic N.
Skatov T.
6-766-46-4
Caruso S.[1]
Cobolli F.
6-43-66-3
R16
Sachko V.
Moroni G.
7-54-66-4
Cobolli F.
Baldi F.
6-27-63
Rune H.
Klein L.
6-46-4
Serdarusic N.
Zhang Z.[4]
7-666-4
Skatov T.
Olivo R.[8]
7-57-5
Etcheverry T.[7]
Stricker D.
7-56-4
Fatic N.
Kuzmanov D.
6-47-65
Caruso S.[1]
Forti F.
6-46-4
R32
Klein L.
Bonadio R.
6-17-64
Rune H.
Fabbiano T.[5]
6-14-66-2
Zhang Z.[4]
Passaro F.
3-66-36-2
Serdarusic N.
Pellegrino A.
6-36-3
Skatov T.
Giustino L.
1-67-656-0
Fatic N.
Cachin P.
6-47-65
Kuzmanov D.
Gaio F.[3]
2-66-37-62
Cobolli F.
Popko D.[6]
2-67-57-63
Forti F.
Collarini A.
4-67-56-1
Caruso S.[1]
Vanni L.
7-656-4
Sachko V.
Martin A.[2]
6-33-66-2
Moroni G.
Furness E.
2-0
Baldi F.
Borges N.
3-63-5
Olivo R.[8]
Zeppieri G.
6-757-56-2
Etcheverry T.[7]
Arnaboldi A.
7-636-2
Stricker D.
Maden Y.
7-636-1