Lukas Klein vs Riccardo Bonadio — Perugia CH Round of 32

Perugia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Lukas Klein
SVK
Lukas Klein
#185ATP
1601ELO
1624Clay ELO
$64kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 July 2021
clay
ITA
Riccardo Bonadio
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWLW
Klein L.
6-1 7-6
Bonadio R.
Klein L.
6772
Bonadio R.
1640

Lukas Klein defeated Riccardo Bonadio 6-1 7-6 in the Perugia CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Lukas Klein came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Klein L.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Bonadio R.

Bonadio R.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Klein L.

Serve advantage — Klein L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Klein L.Bonadio R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.6
2.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Klein L.Bonadio R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
39
26
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
70
Break points won·Clear edge
1
19
Deciding sets·Clear edge
63
44
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
31
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Klein L.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Bonadio R.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
4.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.3
Minutes 14d
9.2
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
3.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Etcheverry T.[7]
Sachko V.
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Etcheverry T.[7]
Caruso S.[1]
7-55-76-2
Sachko V.
Serdarusic N.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Etcheverry T.[7]
Fatic N.
6-36-1
Sachko V.
Rune H.
6-37-64
Serdarusic N.
Skatov T.
6-766-46-4
Caruso S.[1]
Cobolli F.
6-43-66-3
R16
Sachko V.
Moroni G.
7-54-66-4
Cobolli F.
Baldi F.
6-27-63
Rune H.
Klein L.
6-46-4
Serdarusic N.
Zhang Z.[4]
7-666-4
Skatov T.
Olivo R.[8]
7-57-5
Etcheverry T.[7]
Stricker D.
7-56-4
Fatic N.
Kuzmanov D.
6-47-65
Caruso S.[1]
Forti F.
6-46-4
R32
Klein L.
Bonadio R.
6-17-64
Rune H.
Fabbiano T.[5]
6-14-66-2
Zhang Z.[4]
Passaro F.
3-66-36-2
Serdarusic N.
Pellegrino A.
6-36-3
Skatov T.
Giustino L.
1-67-656-0
Fatic N.
Cachin P.
6-47-65
Kuzmanov D.
Gaio F.[3]
2-66-37-62
Cobolli F.
Popko D.[6]
2-67-57-63
Forti F.
Collarini A.
4-67-56-1
Caruso S.[1]
Vanni L.
7-656-4
Sachko V.
Martin A.[2]
6-33-66-2
Moroni G.
Furness E.
2-0
Baldi F.
Borges N.
3-63-5
Olivo R.[8]
Zeppieri G.
6-757-56-2
Etcheverry T.[7]
Arnaboldi A.
7-636-2
Stricker D.
Maden Y.
7-636-1