Facundo Bagnis vs Federico Coria — Salzburg CH Final

Salzburg CH · CHALLENGER · Final
ARG4
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 July 2021
clay
Federico Coria
ARG3
Federico Coria
#783ATP
1537ELO
1515Clay ELO
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
Bagnis F.
6-4 3-6 6-2
Coria F.
Bagnis F.
6362
Coria F.
4621

Facundo Bagnis defeated Federico Coria 6-4 3-6 6-2 in the Salzburg CH final on clay. The result followed the form book — Facundo Bagnis came in ranked #431, leading the head-to-head 2–0. Facundo Bagnis extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Facundo Bagnis closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–2.

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-02-05CordobaSFclayFacundo Bagnis6-3 7-5
2019-02-04CordobaQ2clayFacundo Bagnis6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Coria F.

Coria F.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Coria F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
58%
Return points won·Even
40%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
2.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bagnis F.Coria F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
54
67
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
71
Break points won·Dominant
35
72
Deciding sets·Slight edge
89
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bagnis F.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Coria F.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.5+69 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Clay Elo 1515
5.3Overall Elo 1591
ELO gap
4.7Overall Elo 1537
4.6
H2H
5.4
8.0
Surface form
8.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
4.0
7.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
6.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bagnis F.Coria F.
Freshness·
—
80

Coria F.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 53 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Bagnis F.[4]
Coria F.[3]
6-43-66-2
Semi-finals
Coria F.[3]
Londero J.
6-16-4
Bagnis F.[4]
Jarry N.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Londero J.
Cuevas P.[2]
6-36-0
Coria F.[3]
Rola B.
6-27-65
Bagnis F.[4]
Dzumhur D.
6-16-2
Jarry N.
Lehecka J.
7-666-4
R16
Cuevas P.[2]
Petrovic D.
6-16-4
Londero J.
Vatutin A.
6-02-66-0
Coria F.[3]
Huesler M.
6-14-66-4
Rola B.
Carballes Baena R.[5]
5-76-27-64
Dzumhur D.
Taberner C.[8]
7-626-756-2
Lehecka J.
Muller A.
6-26-4
Jarry N.
Heller P.
6-26-4
Bagnis F.[4]
Gaston H.
6-46-1
R32
Londero J.
Daniel T.[6]
6-46-4
Coria F.[3]
Melzer G.
6-36-4
Huesler M.
Rosol L.
6-36-4
Rola B.
Novak D.
7-57-64
Carballes Baena R.[5]
Neuchrist M.
6-44-66-4
Taberner C.[8]
Viola M.
6-46-4
Dzumhur D.
Mena F.
6-46-0
Gaston H.
Bachinger M.
6-46-3
Bagnis F.[4]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-36-2
Muller A.
Galan D.[7]
7-57-63
Lehecka J.
Aichhorn J.
6-46-3
Heller P.
Cerundolo F.
6-33-66-3
Petrovic D.
Gulbis E.
6-27-64
Vatutin A.
Erler A.
2-66-46-2
Cuevas P.[2]
Yevseyev D.
7-56-3
Jarry N.
Monteiro T.[1]
6-727-647-64