Benoit Paire vs Guido Andreozzi — Braunschweig CH Round of 32

Braunschweig CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA1
Benoit Paire
#1096ATP
1362ELO
1385Clay ELO
37 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 July 2021
clay
ARG
Guido Andreozzi
#1536ATP
34 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLWWL
Paire B.
6-4 2-6 7-5
Andreozzi G.
Paire B.
6272
Andreozzi G.
4651

Benoit Paire defeated Guido Andreozzi 6-4 2-6 7-5 in the Braunschweig CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Benoit Paire closed it out in three sets, 6–4 2–6 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Paire B.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Andreozzi G.

Andreozzi G.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Paire B.

Serve advantage — Andreozzi G.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Paire B.Andreozzi G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
52%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
43%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
57%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.9
2.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
6.2
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 125). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Paire B.Andreozzi G.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
48
31
Break points saved·Clear edge
90
66
Break points won·Slight edge
31
21
Deciding sets·Clear edge
53
34
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
58
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Paire B.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Andreozzi G.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.0
Surface form
6.8
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
8.3
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Altmaier D.[8]
Laaksonen H.[5]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[8]
Moeller M.
7-56-0
Laaksonen H.[5]
Kopriva V.
6-46-0
Quarter-finals
Moeller M.
Hassan B.
6-46-2
Altmaier D.[8]
Ymer E.
6-36-3
Laaksonen H.[5]
Kovalik J.[4]
6-36-2
Kopriva V.
Bergs Z.
3-66-07-5
R16
Hassan B.
Ehrat S.
4-66-36-4
Moeller M.
Nagal S.[7]
6-31-66-2
Ymer E.
Hanfmann Y.[3]
2-66-36-2
Altmaier D.[8]
Vilella Martinez M.
6-36-2
Kovalik J.[4]
Jaziri M.
6-17-5
Bergs Z.
Machac T.[6]
7-655-76-4
Kopriva V.
Paire B.[1]
6-12-66-2
Laaksonen H.[5]
Kuhn N.
6-47-5
R32
Hassan B.
Kelly D.
6-47-67
Moeller M.
Gabashvili T.
7-56-3
Nagal S.[7]
Safwat M.
6-37-63
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Diez S.
7-52-66-3
Ymer E.
Kamke T.
6-37-5
Vilella Martinez M.
Molleker R.
3-66-46-3
Altmaier D.[8]
Kolar Z.
6-27-5
Laaksonen H.[5]
Rosenkranz M.
6-36-2
Kuhn N.
Zverev M.
6-27-64
Jaziri M.
Vukic A.
6-36-4
Machac T.[6]
Coppejans K.
6-26-3
Bergs Z.
Marterer M.
6-26-1
Kopriva V.
Michalski D.
6-26-2
Paire B.[1]
Andreozzi G.
6-42-67-5
Ehrat S.
Moraing M.
6-756-46-4
Kovalik J.[4]
Horansky F.
7-656-3