Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Goncalo Oliveira — Porto CH Quarter-final

Porto CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
UKR
Sergiy Stakhovsky
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 June 2021
hard
VEN
Goncalo Oliveira
31 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWLL
Stakhovsky S.
7-6 7-6
Oliveira G.
Stakhovsky S.
77772
Oliveira G.
62650

Sergiy Stakhovsky defeated Goncalo Oliveira 7-6 7-6 in the Porto CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Stakhovsky S.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Oliveira G.

Oliveira G.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Stakhovsky S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Stakhovsky S.Oliveira G.
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.2
3.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.7
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (47 vs 136). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Stakhovsky S.Oliveira G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
41
0
Break points saved·Clear edge
88
64
Break points won·Even
3
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
57
1
Tiebreaks·Dominant
59
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Stakhovsky S.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Oliveira G.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
6.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
7.3
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Celikbilek A.
Halys Q.
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Halys Q.
Gomez E.[3]
6-46-4
Celikbilek A.
Stakhovsky S.
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Halys Q.
Diez S.
6-36-0
Gomez E.[3]
Elias G.
6-37-64
Celikbilek A.
Ito T.
7-56-3
Stakhovsky S.
Oliveira G.
7-627-65
R16
Stakhovsky S.
Viola M.
6-24-67-5
Diez S.
Gunneswaran P.[2]
6-31-66-4
Halys Q.
Kokkinakis T.[7]
7-656-4
Gomez E.[3]
Blancaneaux G.
6-16-776-1
Elias G.
Istomin D.[8]
7-56-4
Oliveira G.
Polansky P.
7-636-4
Celikbilek A.
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
7-656-3
Ito T.
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
6-41-0
R32
Viola M.
Cid R.
6-14-1
Ito T.
Faria L.
6-06-2
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Olivo R.
6-46-2
Gunneswaran P.[2]
Bourgue M.
6-23-66-1
Diez S.
Janvier M.
7-52-67-65
Kokkinakis T.[7]
Marcora R.
7-636-1
Gomez E.[3]
Kuhn N.
7-56-2
Blancaneaux G.
Domingues J.
6-756-26-4
Elias G.
Verbeek S.
6-776-46-1
Istomin D.[8]
Andreozzi G.
6-46-3
Stakhovsky S.
Soeda G.[6]
2-66-27-65
Oliveira G.
Borges N.
6-16-2
Polansky P.
Tabilo A.[4]
1-66-16-2
Celikbilek A.
Watanuki Y.
6-36-756-3
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
Giustino L.
6-44-66-3
Halys Q.
Blanch U.
6-33-66-1