Tatsuma Ito vs Elias YmerWimbledon Qualifying Round 1

Wimbledon · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 June 2021
grass
#183ATP
1548ELO
1502Grass ELO
$191kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWW
Ito T.
6-3 6-4
Ymer E.
Ito T.
662
Ymer E.
34

Tatsuma Ito defeated Elias Ymer 6-3 6-4 in the Wimbledon qualifying round 1 on grass. The result followed the form book — Tatsuma Ito came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Tatsuma Ito extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Tatsuma Ito closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

10
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-06-28WimbledonQ1grassTatsuma Ito6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Ito T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ymer E.

Ymer E.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Serve advantage — Ymer E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
58%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
57%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.4
4.7
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (55 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
24
48
Break points saved·Clear edge
61
83
Break points won·Clear edge
9
23
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
78
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
48
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·
100

Ymer E.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw — qualifying

Q1
Schnur B.
Diez S.
6-32-66-3
Zhang Z.
Varillas J.
6-16-1
Uchiyama Y.
Peniston R.
3-66-26-4
Sela D.
Parker S.
6-43-67-5
Janvier M.
Gomez E.
6-13-66-3
Otte O.
Laaksonen H.
6-46-4
Kudla D.
Pellegrino A.
6-46-2
Zuk K.
Rosol L.
6-36-3
Safiullin R.
Karlovic I.
6-36-4
Gaio F.
Rola B.
6-46-4
Rinderknech A.
Bourgue M.
3-67-56-2
Pinnington Jones J.
Menezes J.
6-46-3
Kolar Z.
Klizan M.
6-16-2
Milojevic N.
Lacko L.
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.
Fabbiano T.
7-686-767-5
Mochizuki S.
Gaston H.
1-66-26-4
Ebden M.
Baez S.
6-736-36-2
Fery A.
Gunneswaran P.
6-17-65
Bonzi B.
Ficovich J.
7-56-1
Altmaier D.
Marterer M.
6-26-4
Safwat M.
Torpegaard M.
7-53-67-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Donskoy E.
7-56-3
Zapata Miralles B.
Giannessi A.
7-656-3
Tomic B.
Kavcic B.
4-66-46-3
Tabilo A.
Muller A.
6-26-4
Marcora R.
Baldi F.
6-37-5
Cerundolo F.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-46-2
Nakashima B.
Vukic A.
6-16-1
Troicki V.
Eubanks C.
6-46-767-5
Gulbis E.
Popko D.
6-35-76-4
Martin A.
Moraing M.
6-46-3
Cressy M.
Kokkinakis T.
7-657-63
Huesler M.
Cid R.
7-674-66-1
Marchenko I.
Giustino L.
7-57-62
Mcdonald M.
Coppejans K.
6-757-56-2
Couacaud E.
Cerundolo J.
4-66-26-3
Barrios Vera T.
Krueger M.
7-627-65
Haase R.
Andreozzi G.
6-46-4
Majchrzak K.
Maden Y.
6-16-4
Matusevich A.
Jansen W.
4-66-06-4
Taberner C.
Collarini A.
6-46-2
Seyboth Wild T.
Kamke T.
6-46-4
Trungelliti M.
Mayer L.
6-46-2
Celikbilek A.
Lestienne C.
6-727-646-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Lorenzi P.
7-56-3
Dzumhur D.
Halys Q.
6-46-4
Molcan A.
Escobedo E.
2-67-58-6
Copil M.
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-3
Hoang A.
Kwiatkowski T.
3-66-36-4
Ramanathan R.
Kovalik J.
6-36-0
Etcheverry T.
Ilkel C.
6-16-4
Gill F.
Petrovic D.
7-57-66
Polmans M.
Gojo B.
6-36-3
Dellien H.
Mchugh A.
6-26-1
Masur D.
Domingues J.
6-16-2
Kuznetsov A.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-46-756-2
Ofner S.
Stebe C.
6-26-3
Barrere G.
Fratangelo B.
2-66-36-4
Stakhovsky S.
Soeda G.
6-37-611
Ito T.
Ymer E.
6-36-4
Jung J.
Gojowczyk P.
6-37-64
Oconnell C.
Horansky F.
3-66-19-7
Bemelmans R.
Olivo R.
6-27-5
Machac T.
Robredo T.
7-54-610-8