Quentin Halys vs Ulises Blanch — Porto CH Round of 32

Porto CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Quentin Halys
FRA
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 June 2021
hard
USA
Ulises Blanch
#1661ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWWW
Halys Q.
6-3 3-6 6-1
Blanch U.
Halys Q.
6362
Blanch U.
3611

Quentin Halys defeated Ulises Blanch 6-3 3-6 6-1 in the Porto CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Quentin Halys came in ranked #90.

Key context

  • Match story: Quentin Halys closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Halys Q.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Blanch U.

Blanch U.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Halys Q.Blanch U.
39
Serve
—
26
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Halys Q.Blanch U.
1st serve in·Even
58%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
67%
64%
Return points won·Even
34%
36%
Break points saved·Even
65%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.1
6.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.9
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 150). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Halys Q.Blanch U.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
19
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
83
Break points won·Even
4
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
75
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Halys Q.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Blanch U.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
5.3
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.3
Minutes 14d
8.1
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Halys Q.Blanch U.
Freshness·
93
—

Halys Q.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Celikbilek A.
Halys Q.
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Halys Q.
Gomez E.[3]
6-46-4
Celikbilek A.
Stakhovsky S.
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Halys Q.
Diez S.
6-36-0
Gomez E.[3]
Elias G.
6-37-64
Celikbilek A.
Ito T.
7-56-3
Stakhovsky S.
Oliveira G.
7-627-65
R16
Stakhovsky S.
Viola M.
6-24-67-5
Diez S.
Gunneswaran P.[2]
6-31-66-4
Halys Q.
Kokkinakis T.[7]
7-656-4
Gomez E.[3]
Blancaneaux G.
6-16-776-1
Elias G.
Istomin D.[8]
7-56-4
Oliveira G.
Polansky P.
7-636-4
Celikbilek A.
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
7-656-3
Ito T.
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
6-41-0
R32
Viola M.
Cid R.
6-14-1
Ito T.
Faria L.
6-06-2
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Olivo R.
6-46-2
Gunneswaran P.[2]
Bourgue M.
6-23-66-1
Diez S.
Janvier M.
7-52-67-65
Kokkinakis T.[7]
Marcora R.
7-636-1
Gomez E.[3]
Kuhn N.
7-56-2
Blancaneaux G.
Domingues J.
6-756-26-4
Elias G.
Verbeek S.
6-776-46-1
Istomin D.[8]
Andreozzi G.
6-46-3
Stakhovsky S.
Soeda G.[6]
2-66-27-65
Oliveira G.
Borges N.
6-16-2
Polansky P.
Tabilo A.[4]
1-66-16-2
Celikbilek A.
Watanuki Y.
6-36-756-3
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
Giustino L.
6-44-66-3
Halys Q.
Blanch U.
6-33-66-1