Denis Istomin vs Guido Andreozzi — Porto CH Round of 32

Porto CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
UZB8
Denis Istomin
39 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 June 2021
hard
ARG
Guido Andreozzi
#1536ATP
34 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLWWL
Istomin D.
6-4 6-3
Andreozzi G.
Istomin D.
662
Andreozzi G.
430

Denis Istomin defeated Guido Andreozzi 6-4 6-3 in the Porto CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Denis Istomin closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Istomin D.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Andreozzi G.

Andreozzi G.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Istomin D.

Serve advantage — Andreozzi G.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Istomin D.Andreozzi G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.4
2.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (86 vs 125). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Istomin D.Andreozzi G.
Clutch Rating·Even
29
31
Break points saved·Clear edge
90
66
Break points won·Clear edge
5
21
Deciding sets·Slight edge
44
34
Tiebreaks·Dominant
18
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Istomin D.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Andreozzi G.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
3.7
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Celikbilek A.
Halys Q.
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Halys Q.
Gomez E.[3]
6-46-4
Celikbilek A.
Stakhovsky S.
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Halys Q.
Diez S.
6-36-0
Gomez E.[3]
Elias G.
6-37-64
Celikbilek A.
Ito T.
7-56-3
Stakhovsky S.
Oliveira G.
7-627-65
R16
Stakhovsky S.
Viola M.
6-24-67-5
Diez S.
Gunneswaran P.[2]
6-31-66-4
Halys Q.
Kokkinakis T.[7]
7-656-4
Gomez E.[3]
Blancaneaux G.
6-16-776-1
Elias G.
Istomin D.[8]
7-56-4
Oliveira G.
Polansky P.
7-636-4
Celikbilek A.
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
7-656-3
Ito T.
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
6-41-0
R32
Viola M.
Cid R.
6-14-1
Ito T.
Faria L.
6-06-2
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Olivo R.
6-46-2
Gunneswaran P.[2]
Bourgue M.
6-23-66-1
Diez S.
Janvier M.
7-52-67-65
Kokkinakis T.[7]
Marcora R.
7-636-1
Gomez E.[3]
Kuhn N.
7-56-2
Blancaneaux G.
Domingues J.
6-756-26-4
Elias G.
Verbeek S.
6-776-46-1
Istomin D.[8]
Andreozzi G.
6-46-3
Stakhovsky S.
Soeda G.[6]
2-66-27-65
Oliveira G.
Borges N.
6-16-2
Polansky P.
Tabilo A.[4]
1-66-16-2
Celikbilek A.
Watanuki Y.
6-36-756-3
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
Giustino L.
6-44-66-3
Halys Q.
Blanch U.
6-33-66-1