Vasek Pospisil vs James Ward — Eastbourne Round of 32

Eastbourne · ATP · Round of 32
CAN
Vasek Pospisil
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 June 2021
grass
GBR
James Ward
39 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWWL
Pospisil V.
6-4 6-4
Ward J.
Pospisil V.
662
Ward J.
440

Vasek Pospisil defeated James Ward 6-4 6-4 in the Eastbourne round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Vasek Pospisil came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Vasek Pospisil extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Vasek Pospisil edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-06-26EastbourneQ1grassVasek Pospisil6-1 6-4
2015-06-29WimbledonR32grassVasek Pospisil6-4 3-6 2-6 6-3 8-6

Serve vs return

This season
Pospisil V.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Ward J.

Ward J.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Pospisil V.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pospisil V.Ward J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
45%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
35%
33%
Break points saved·Even
65%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
9.6
6.9
Double faults / match·Even
4.1
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (138 vs 7). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pospisil V.Ward J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
49
29
Break points saved·Slight edge
96
86
Break points won·Even
7
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
62
36
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
39

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pospisil V.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ward J.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
4.8
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
6.5
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
De Minaur A.[2]
Sonego L.[3]
4-66-47-65
Semi-finals
De Minaur A.[2]
Kwon S.
6-37-62
Sonego L.[3]
Purcell M.
6-13-66-1
Quarter-finals
De Minaur A.[2]
Pospisil V.
6-46-4
Kwon S.
Ivashka I.
6-47-5
Sonego L.[3]
Bublik A.[8]
6-17-5
Purcell M.
Seppi A.
6-41-66-4
R16
Pospisil V.
Davidovich Fokina A.[6]
7-610-0
De Minaur A.[2]
Broady L.
6-36-4
Kwon S.
Fucsovics M.
7-646-746-3
Ivashka I.
Popyrin A.
6-757-56-3
Bublik A.[8]
Gerasimov E.
6-26-2
Sonego L.[3]
Millman J.
6-46-2
Purcell M.
Monfils G.[1]
6-45-76-4
Seppi A.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-3
R32
Broady L.
Tiafoe F.
6-37-64
Pospisil V.
Ward J.
6-46-4
Davidovich Fokina A.[6]
Ymer M.
7-56-1
Fucsovics M.
Bedene A.
7-633-67-63
Bublik A.[8]
Kukushkin M.
6-16-4
Gerasimov E.
Tsonga J.
6-36-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Ramos A.[7]
6-46-3
Purcell M.
Duckworth J.
6-23-67-65
Seppi A.
Nishioka Y.
7-656-1
Ivashka I.
Gray A.
6-27-65
Popyrin A.
Gombos N.
4-66-46-1
Millman J.
Clarke J.
6-36-2