Petra Kvitova vs Nadia Podoroska — Bad Homburg Quarter-final

Bad Homburg · WTA · Quarter-final
CZE1
Petra Kvitova
#1010WTA
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 June 2021
grass
ARG5
Nadia Podoroska
#574WTA
29 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWWW
Kvitova P.
6-3 7-6
Podoroska N.
Kvitova P.
67122
Podoroska N.
36100

Petra Kvitova defeated Nadia Podoroska 6-3 7-6 in the Bad Homburg quarter-final on grass. Petra Kvitova extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Petra Kvitova closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-06-19BerlinR16grassPetra Kvitova6-1 6-1
2021-01-31Yarra Valley ClassicR16hardNadia Podoroska5-7 6-1 7-6(7)

Serve vs return

This season
Kvitova P.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Podoroska N.

Podoroska N.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kvitova P.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kvitova P.Podoroska N.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
56%
Return points won·Even
42%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.9
1.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.9
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (138 vs 171). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kvitova P.Podoroska N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
88
52
Break points saved·Dominant
93
42
Break points won·Slight edge
88
81
Deciding sets·Slight edge
90
84
Tiebreaks·Dominant
92
56

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kvitova P.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Podoroska N.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
9.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
24°CPartly cloudy
Wind 28 km/hHumidity 49%

Draw

Final
Kerber A.[4]
Siniakova K.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Kerber A.[4]
Kvitova P.[1]
3-66-47-63
Siniakova K.
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Azarenka V.[2]
W/O
Kerber A.[4]
Anisimova A.
2-66-36-3
Kvitova P.[1]
Podoroska N.[5]
6-37-610
Siniakova K.
Siegemund L.[8]
7-56-4
R16
Siegemund L.[8]
Korpatsch T.[5]
6-26-2
Kvitova P.[1]
Li A.
6-26-746-1
Kerber A.[4]
Blinkova A.
6-06-2
Anisimova A.
Petkovic A.
6-17-5
Podoroska N.[5]
Tig P.
7-642-66-4
Siniakova K.
Pegula J.[3]
6-35-76-4
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Doi M.
6-46-4
Azarenka V.[2]
Cornet A.
6-43-67-67
R32
Siniakova K.
Gracheva V.
6-36-2
Podoroska N.[5]
Guth M.
6-06-3
Kerber A.[4]
Yashina E.
6-16-1
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Trevisan M.
6-43-66-2
Kvitova P.[1]
Piter K.
4-66-16-4
Li A.
Zaja A.
6-06-4
Tig P.
Barthel M.
7-646-3
Korpatsch T.[5]
Peterson R.
7-52-67-65
Blinkova A.
Tauson C.
7-64-66-2
Anisimova A.
Kovinic D.
6-26-1
Petkovic A.
Cirstea S.[6]
6-36-4
Siegemund L.[8]
Bhatia R.
2-67-626-1
Doi M.
Danilina A.
6-26-2
Cornet A.
Rus A.
6-32-66-1
Azarenka V.[2]
Hatouka Y.
7-56-0
Pegula J.[3]
Hesse A.
6-16-2