Petra Kvitova vs Ann Li — Bad Homburg Round of 16

Bad Homburg · WTA · Round of 16
CZE1
Petra Kvitova
#1219WTA
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 June 2021
grass
Ann Li
USA
Ann Li
#31WTA
1807ELO
1595Grass ELO
$718kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
26 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLWW
Kvitova P.
6-2 6-7 6-1
Li A.
Kvitova P.
66462
Li A.
27711

Petra Kvitova defeated Ann Li 6-2 6-7 6-1 in the Bad Homburg round of 16 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Ann Li came in ranked #31.

Key context

  • Match story: Petra Kvitova came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–2 6–7 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kvitova P.serving85% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Li A.

Li A.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kvitova P.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kvitova P.Li A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Even
42%
44%
Break points saved·Even
59%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.9
3.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.9
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (138 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kvitova P.Li A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
88
76
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
83
Break points won·Even
88
87
Deciding sets·Even
90
87
Tiebreaks·Dominant
92
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kvitova P.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Li A.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
Fatigue & Travel
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kvitova P.Li A.
Freshness·
—
97

Li A.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
24°CPartly cloudy
Wind 28 km/hHumidity 49%

Draw

Final
Kerber A.[4]
Siniakova K.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Kerber A.[4]
Kvitova P.[1]
3-66-47-63
Siniakova K.
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Azarenka V.[2]
W/O
Kerber A.[4]
Anisimova A.
2-66-36-3
Kvitova P.[1]
Podoroska N.[5]
6-37-610
Siniakova K.
Siegemund L.[8]
7-56-4
R16
Siegemund L.[8]
Korpatsch T.[5]
6-26-2
Kvitova P.[1]
Li A.
6-26-746-1
Kerber A.[4]
Blinkova A.
6-06-2
Anisimova A.
Petkovic A.
6-17-5
Podoroska N.[5]
Tig P.
7-642-66-4
Siniakova K.
Pegula J.[3]
6-35-76-4
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Doi M.
6-46-4
Azarenka V.[2]
Cornet A.
6-43-67-67
R32
Siniakova K.
Gracheva V.
6-36-2
Podoroska N.[5]
Guth M.
6-06-3
Kerber A.[4]
Yashina E.
6-16-1
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Trevisan M.
6-43-66-2
Kvitova P.[1]
Piter K.
4-66-16-4
Li A.
Zaja A.
6-06-4
Tig P.
Barthel M.
7-646-3
Korpatsch T.[5]
Peterson R.
7-52-67-65
Blinkova A.
Tauson C.
7-64-66-2
Anisimova A.
Kovinic D.
6-26-1
Petkovic A.
Cirstea S.[6]
6-36-4
Siegemund L.[8]
Bhatia R.
2-67-626-1
Doi M.
Danilina A.
6-26-2
Cornet A.
Rus A.
6-32-66-1
Azarenka V.[2]
Hatouka Y.
7-56-0
Pegula J.[3]
Hesse A.
6-16-2