Camila Giorgi vs Shelby Rogers — Eastbourne Round of 16

Eastbourne · WTA · Round of 16
ITA
Camila Giorgi
34 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 June 2021
grass
USA
Shelby Rogers
33 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLWL
Giorgi C.
6-3 4-6 6-2
Rogers S.
Giorgi C.
6462
Rogers S.
3621

Camila Giorgi defeated Shelby Rogers 6-3 4-6 6-2 in the Eastbourne round of 16 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Shelby Rogers came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Camila Giorgi claimed a first win over Shelby Rogers in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Camila Giorgi closed it out in three sets, 6–3 4–6 6–2.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-07-07Bad GasteinQFclayShelby Rogers6-1 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Giorgi C.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Rogers S.

Rogers S.serving82% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Giorgi C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Giorgi C.Rogers S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
48%
Service points won·Even
57%
59%
Return points won·Even
44%
41%
Break points saved·Even
55%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.1
3.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
6.8
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (116 vs 134). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Giorgi C.Rogers S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
54
42
Break points saved·Clear edge
71
86
Break points won·Even
81
84
Deciding sets·Dominant
45
15
Tiebreaks·Dominant
83
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Giorgi C.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Rogers S.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
3.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
9.0
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
5.2
Country comfort
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
14°CRain
Wind 33 km/hHumidity 87%

Draw

Final
Ostapenko J.[3]
Kontaveit A.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Ostapenko J.[3]
Rybakina E.
6-46-1
Kontaveit A.
Giorgi C.
5-4
Quarter-finals
Kontaveit A.
Golubic V.
2-67-627-5
Ostapenko J.[3]
Kasatkina D.
1-67-56-2
Giorgi C.
Sabalenka A.[1]
7-650-66-4
Rybakina E.
Sevastova A.
2-67-677-65
R16
Golubic V.
Bencic B.[6]
6-46-4
Ostapenko J.[3]
Jabeur O.
5-76-46-3
Rybakina E.
Svitolina E.[2]
6-47-63
Sabalenka A.[1]
Riske Amritraj A.
6-16-4
Kontaveit A.
Andreescu B.[3]
6-36-3
Giorgi C.
Rogers S.
6-34-66-2
Kasatkina D.
Swiatek I.[4]
4-66-06-1
Sevastova A.
Gauff C.
4-67-56-2
R32
Golubic V.
Stosur S.
6-26-3
Rybakina E.
Dart H.
6-26-756-4
Kasatkina D.
Zvonareva V.
7-52-2
Kontaveit A.
Kuznetsova S.
6-43-66-3
Bencic B.[6]
Martic P.
6-16-3
Ostapenko J.[3]
Pavlyuchenkova A.[8]
6-16-3
Sabalenka A.[1]
Pera B.
6-36-4
Riske Amritraj A.
Kudermetova V.
6-36-4
Swiatek I.[4]
Watson H.
6-36-747-5
Gauff C.
Mertens E.[7]
0-67-647-5
Rogers S.
Bertens K.
6-17-5
Giorgi C.
Pliskova K.[5]
2-66-26-2
Andreescu B.[3]
Mchale C.
6-42-66-2
Jabeur O.
Vondrousova M.
6-37-64
Sevastova A.
Kostyuk M.
6-16-766-4
Svitolina E.[2]
Badosa P.
4-66-17-61