Anett Kontaveit vs Camila Giorgi — Eastbourne Semi-final

Eastbourne · WTA · Semi-final
EST
Anett Kontaveit
30 yrs · 174 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 21 June 2021
grass
ITA
Camila Giorgi
34 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWL
Kontaveit A.
5-4
Giorgi C.
Kontaveit A.
5–
Giorgi C.
4–

Anett Kontaveit advanced when Camila Giorgi retired 5-4 in the Eastbourne semi-final. Anett Kontaveit extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-02-06Fed Cup G1 RR: ITA vs ESTRRhardAnett Kontaveit6-3 4-6 7-6(4)

Serve vs return

This season
Kontaveit A.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Giorgi C.

Giorgi C.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kontaveit A.

Serve advantage — Kontaveit A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kontaveit A.Giorgi C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
46%
Service points won·Even
60%
57%
Return points won·Even
44%
44%
Break points saved·Even
57%
55%
Aces / match·Even
3.3
3.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.8
6.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (117 vs 116). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kontaveit A.Giorgi C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
82
54
Break points saved·Clear edge
85
71
Break points won·Slight edge
91
81
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
45
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
77
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kontaveit A.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Giorgi C.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
4.8
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.8
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Country comfort
5.2
3.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
14°CRain
Wind 33 km/hHumidity 87%

Draw

Final
Ostapenko J.[3]
Kontaveit A.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Ostapenko J.[3]
Rybakina E.
6-46-1
Kontaveit A.
Giorgi C.
5-4
Quarter-finals
Kontaveit A.
Golubic V.
2-67-627-5
Ostapenko J.[3]
Kasatkina D.
1-67-56-2
Giorgi C.
Sabalenka A.[1]
7-650-66-4
Rybakina E.
Sevastova A.
2-67-677-65
R16
Golubic V.
Bencic B.[6]
6-46-4
Ostapenko J.[3]
Jabeur O.
5-76-46-3
Rybakina E.
Svitolina E.[2]
6-47-63
Sabalenka A.[1]
Riske Amritraj A.
6-16-4
Kontaveit A.
Andreescu B.[3]
6-36-3
Giorgi C.
Rogers S.
6-34-66-2
Kasatkina D.
Swiatek I.[4]
4-66-06-1
Sevastova A.
Gauff C.
4-67-56-2
R32
Golubic V.
Stosur S.
6-26-3
Rybakina E.
Dart H.
6-26-756-4
Kasatkina D.
Zvonareva V.
7-52-2
Kontaveit A.
Kuznetsova S.
6-43-66-3
Bencic B.[6]
Martic P.
6-16-3
Ostapenko J.[3]
Pavlyuchenkova A.[8]
6-16-3
Sabalenka A.[1]
Pera B.
6-36-4
Riske Amritraj A.
Kudermetova V.
6-36-4
Swiatek I.[4]
Watson H.
6-36-747-5
Gauff C.
Mertens E.[7]
0-67-647-5
Rogers S.
Bertens K.
6-17-5
Giorgi C.
Pliskova K.[5]
2-66-26-2
Andreescu B.[3]
Mchale C.
6-42-66-2
Jabeur O.
Vondrousova M.
6-37-64
Sevastova A.
Kostyuk M.
6-16-766-4
Svitolina E.[2]
Badosa P.
4-66-17-61