Egor Gerasimov vs Jo-Wilfried Tsonga — Eastbourne Round of 32

Eastbourne · ATP · Round of 32
BLR
Egor Gerasimov
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 June 2021
grass
FRA
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
41 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
Gerasimov E.
6-3 6-4
Tsonga J.
Gerasimov E.
662
Tsonga J.
340

Egor Gerasimov defeated Jo-Wilfried Tsonga 6-3 6-4 in the Eastbourne round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Egor Gerasimov came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Egor Gerasimov extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-04-19BarcelonaR64clayEgor Gerasimov7-5 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Gerasimov E.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Tsonga J.

Tsonga J.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Gerasimov E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gerasimov E.Tsonga J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
30%
Break points saved·Even
61%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.3
8.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 21). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gerasimov E.Tsonga J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
44
75
Break points saved·Slight edge
88
99
Break points won·Dominant
8
39
Deciding sets·Clear edge
70
91
Tiebreaks·Dominant
40
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gerasimov E.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Tsonga J.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
0.8
Surface form
6.0
0.0Lost last 7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
De Minaur A.[2]
Sonego L.[3]
4-66-47-65
Semi-finals
De Minaur A.[2]
Kwon S.
6-37-62
Sonego L.[3]
Purcell M.
6-13-66-1
Quarter-finals
De Minaur A.[2]
Pospisil V.
6-46-4
Kwon S.
Ivashka I.
6-47-5
Sonego L.[3]
Bublik A.[8]
6-17-5
Purcell M.
Seppi A.
6-41-66-4
R16
Pospisil V.
Davidovich Fokina A.[6]
7-610-0
De Minaur A.[2]
Broady L.
6-36-4
Kwon S.
Fucsovics M.
7-646-746-3
Ivashka I.
Popyrin A.
6-757-56-3
Bublik A.[8]
Gerasimov E.
6-26-2
Sonego L.[3]
Millman J.
6-46-2
Purcell M.
Monfils G.[1]
6-45-76-4
Seppi A.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-3
R32
Broady L.
Tiafoe F.
6-37-64
Pospisil V.
Ward J.
6-46-4
Davidovich Fokina A.[6]
Ymer M.
7-56-1
Fucsovics M.
Bedene A.
7-633-67-63
Bublik A.[8]
Kukushkin M.
6-16-4
Gerasimov E.
Tsonga J.
6-36-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Ramos A.[7]
6-46-3
Purcell M.
Duckworth J.
6-23-67-65
Seppi A.
Nishioka Y.
7-656-1
Ivashka I.
Gray A.
6-27-65
Popyrin A.
Gombos N.
4-66-46-1
Millman J.
Clarke J.
6-36-2