Anastasia Potapova vs Nina Stojanovic — Birmingham Round of 32

Birmingham · WTA · Round of 32
Anastasia Potapova
RUS
Anastasia Potapova
#27WTA
1904ELO
1687Grass ELO
$1.2MYTD
$6.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 June 2021
grass
SRB
Nina Stojanovic
#1138WTA
1609ELO
1554Grass ELO
29 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLLW
Potapova A.
5-7 7-6 6-4
Stojanovic N.
Potapova A.
571062
Stojanovic N.
76841

Anastasia Potapova defeated Nina Stojanovic 5-7 7-6 6-4 in the Birmingham round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Anastasia Potapova came in ranked #27.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Potapova A.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Stojanovic N.

Stojanovic N.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Potapova A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Potapova A.Stojanovic N.
1st serve in·Even
57%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
47%
Service points won·Even
56%
57%
Return points won·Even
45%
43%
Break points saved·Even
57%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.2
3.5
Double faults / match·Even
4.6
4.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 88). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Potapova A.Stojanovic N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
81
37
Break points saved·Dominant
89
46
Break points won·Clear edge
88
69
Deciding sets·Clear edge
96
82
Tiebreaks·Dominant
57
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Potapova A.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Stojanovic N.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
6.6+133 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Grass Elo 1554
8.3Overall Elo 1904
ELO gap
1.7Overall Elo 1609
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.4
Minutes 14d
4.1
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
3.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Potapova A.Stojanovic N.
Freshness·
99
—

Potapova A.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Jabeur O.[2]
Kasatkina D.[4]
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Kasatkina D.[4]
Vandeweghe C.
6-26-4
Jabeur O.[2]
Watson H.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Jabeur O.[2]
Potapova A.
6-46-0
Vandeweghe C.
Bouzkova M.[8]
6-46-4
Kasatkina D.[4]
Martincova T.
6-42-66-0
Watson H.
Vekic D.[3]
6-46-2
R16
Watson H.
Zhang S.[6]
5-2
Kasatkina D.[4]
Kostyuk M.
6-27-5
Vandeweghe C.
Tomljanovic A.
4-66-46-3
Bouzkova M.[8]
Garcia C.
6-36-0
Martincova T.
Ostapenko J.[5]
7-644-66-2
Vekic D.[3]
Giorgi C.
2-66-36-4
Potapova A.
Mladenovic K.
6-36-3
Jabeur O.[2]
Fernandez L.
6-43-67-63
R32
Tomljanovic A.
Mertens E.[1]
7-656-757-64
Martincova T.
Stosur S.
6-36-4
Potapova A.
Stojanovic N.
5-77-686-4
Fernandez L.
Wang Y.
7-56-3
Jabeur O.[2]
Mcnally C.
6-46-2
Kostyuk M.
Brengle M.
4-67-56-3
Zhang S.[6]
Diatchenko V.
6-27-5
Kasatkina D.[4]
Hercog P.
4-66-36-3
Giorgi C.
Gatto Monticone G.
6-36-0
Garcia C.
Dart H.
7-54-66-4
Vekic D.[3]
Jones F.
6-16-3
Ostapenko J.[5]
Davis L.
6-46-1
Watson H.
Golubic V.
3-66-26-2
Mladenovic K.
Ferro F.[7]
3-66-36-4
Vandeweghe C.
Pliskova K.
6-47-61
Bouzkova M.[8]
Hsieh S.
3-66-16-2