Soon Woo Kwon vs Tomas Machac — Nottingham 2 CH Round of 32

Nottingham 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Soon Woo Kwon
KOR2
Soon Woo Kwon
1744ELO
1589Grass ELO
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 June 2021
grass
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1706Grass ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
Kwon S.
3-6 6-3 6-4
Machac T.
Kwon S.
3662
Machac T.
6341

Soon Woo Kwon defeated Tomas Machac 3-6 6-3 6-4 in the Nottingham 2 CH round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Tomas Machac came in leading the head-to-head 2–1. Soon Woo Kwon narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-01-31Davis Cup QLS R1: KOR vs CZERRhardTomas Machac6-2 6-2
2023-01-09Adelaide 2Q2hardTomas Machac7-5 3-6 6-3
2023-01-09Adelaide 2R32hardSoon Woo Kwon6-4 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Kwon S.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Machac T.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Kwon S.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kwon S.Machac T.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
54%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Even
5.3
5.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (152 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kwon S.Machac T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
67
90
Break points saved·Even
94
98
Break points won·Dominant
33
80
Deciding sets·Clear edge
77
94
Tiebreaks·Even
95
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kwon S.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Machac T.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
3.7Grass Elo 1589
Surface ELO
6.3+117 Grass Elo edge
3.6Overall Elo 1744
ELO gap
6.4Overall Elo 1866
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
8.2
0.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
3.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kwon S.Machac T.
Freshness·
97
—

Kwon S.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bolt A.
Majchrzak K.
4-66-46-3
Semi-finals
Majchrzak K.
Bonzi B.
6-36-2
Bolt A.
Mcdonald M.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Bolt A.
Gasquet R.[1]
6-36-791-0
Bonzi B.
Dzumhur D.
7-616-2
Majchrzak K.
Kudla D.
6-766-46-4
Mcdonald M.
Matusevich A.
6-26-3
R16
Mcdonald M.
Zhang Z.
6-46-736-4
Dzumhur D.
Kwon S.[2]
6-46-736-2
Bonzi B.
Escobedo E.
7-6106-1
Kudla D.
Gaio F.
4-66-36-2
Majchrzak K.
Ramanathan R.
6-46-3
Matusevich A.
Fabbiano T.
7-6106-4
Bolt A.
Mchugh A.
6-756-46-4
Gasquet R.[1]
Clarke J.
6-26-3
R32
Gasquet R.[1]
Soeda G.
6-46-2
Kwon S.[2]
Machac T.
3-66-36-4
Dzumhur D.
Donskoy E.
7-646-2
Bonzi B.
Copil M.
6-36-4
Escobedo E.
Uchiyama Y.[8]
4-67-57-66
Gaio F.
Polmans M.
6-47-67
Ramanathan R.
Mayer L.
3-66-37-61
Majchrzak K.
Sugita Y.[7]
6-06-3
Matusevich A.
Ymer M.[5]
6-37-5
Mcdonald M.
Hoang A.
6-46-2
Zhang Z.
Seppi A.[3]
7-616-4
Mchugh A.
Kukushkin M.[6]
7-646-4
Bolt A.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-26-4
Clarke J.
Cressy M.
7-56-787-64
Kudla D.
Anderson K.[4]
7-51-66-3
Fabbiano T.
Nakashima B.
4-67-606-3