Richard Gasquet vs Go Soeda — Nottingham 2 CH Round of 32

Nottingham 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA1
Richard Gasquet
40 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 June 2021
grass
JPN
Go Soeda
41 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Gasquet R.
6-4 6-2
Soeda G.
Gasquet R.
662
Soeda G.
420

Richard Gasquet defeated Go Soeda 6-4 6-2 in the Nottingham 2 CH round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Richard Gasquet came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Richard Gasquet extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2013-06-24WimbledonR64grassRichard Gasquet6-0 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3
2012-02-20MarseilleR32hardRichard Gasquet6-0 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Gasquet R.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Soeda G.

Soeda G.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gasquet R.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gasquet R.Soeda G.
1st serve in·Even
58%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
54%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.7
2.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 45). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gasquet R.Soeda G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
76
23
Break points saved·Dominant
97
61
Break points won·Dominant
49
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
84
46
Tiebreaks·Dominant
94
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gasquet R.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Soeda G.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
7.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 7
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
9.3
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bolt A.
Majchrzak K.
4-66-46-3
Semi-finals
Majchrzak K.
Bonzi B.
6-36-2
Bolt A.
Mcdonald M.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Bolt A.
Gasquet R.[1]
6-36-791-0
Bonzi B.
Dzumhur D.
7-616-2
Majchrzak K.
Kudla D.
6-766-46-4
Mcdonald M.
Matusevich A.
6-26-3
R16
Mcdonald M.
Zhang Z.
6-46-736-4
Dzumhur D.
Kwon S.[2]
6-46-736-2
Bonzi B.
Escobedo E.
7-6106-1
Kudla D.
Gaio F.
4-66-36-2
Majchrzak K.
Ramanathan R.
6-46-3
Matusevich A.
Fabbiano T.
7-6106-4
Bolt A.
Mchugh A.
6-756-46-4
Gasquet R.[1]
Clarke J.
6-26-3
R32
Gasquet R.[1]
Soeda G.
6-46-2
Kwon S.[2]
Machac T.
3-66-36-4
Dzumhur D.
Donskoy E.
7-646-2
Bonzi B.
Copil M.
6-36-4
Escobedo E.
Uchiyama Y.[8]
4-67-57-66
Gaio F.
Polmans M.
6-47-67
Ramanathan R.
Mayer L.
3-66-37-61
Majchrzak K.
Sugita Y.[7]
6-06-3
Matusevich A.
Ymer M.[5]
6-37-5
Mcdonald M.
Hoang A.
6-46-2
Zhang Z.
Seppi A.[3]
7-616-4
Mchugh A.
Kukushkin M.[6]
7-646-4
Bolt A.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-26-4
Clarke J.
Cressy M.
7-56-787-64
Kudla D.
Anderson K.[4]
7-51-66-3
Fabbiano T.
Nakashima B.
4-67-606-3