Denis Kudla vs Federico Gaio — Nottingham 2 CH Round of 16

Nottingham 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 June 2021
grass
ITA
Federico Gaio
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLL
Kudla D.
4-6 6-3 6-2
Gaio F.
Kudla D.
4662
Gaio F.
6321

Denis Kudla defeated Federico Gaio 4-6 6-3 6-2 in the Nottingham 2 CH round of 16 on grass. Denis Kudla extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-09-27San DiegoQ2hardFederico Gaio6-4 6-2
2021-06-28WimbledonQ3grassDenis Kudla6-2 7-5 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Kudla D.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Gaio F.

Gaio F.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kudla D.Gaio F.
1st serve in·Even
59%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.6
4.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kudla D.Gaio F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
50
20
Break points saved·Clear edge
90
76
Break points won·Clear edge
19
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
40
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
30
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kudla D.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gaio F.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
1.5
Minutes 14d
8.4
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bolt A.
Majchrzak K.
4-66-46-3
Semi-finals
Majchrzak K.
Bonzi B.
6-36-2
Bolt A.
Mcdonald M.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Bolt A.
Gasquet R.[1]
6-36-791-0
Bonzi B.
Dzumhur D.
7-616-2
Majchrzak K.
Kudla D.
6-766-46-4
Mcdonald M.
Matusevich A.
6-26-3
R16
Mcdonald M.
Zhang Z.
6-46-736-4
Dzumhur D.
Kwon S.[2]
6-46-736-2
Bonzi B.
Escobedo E.
7-6106-1
Kudla D.
Gaio F.
4-66-36-2
Majchrzak K.
Ramanathan R.
6-46-3
Matusevich A.
Fabbiano T.
7-6106-4
Bolt A.
Mchugh A.
6-756-46-4
Gasquet R.[1]
Clarke J.
6-26-3
R32
Gasquet R.[1]
Soeda G.
6-46-2
Kwon S.[2]
Machac T.
3-66-36-4
Dzumhur D.
Donskoy E.
7-646-2
Bonzi B.
Copil M.
6-36-4
Escobedo E.
Uchiyama Y.[8]
4-67-57-66
Gaio F.
Polmans M.
6-47-67
Ramanathan R.
Mayer L.
3-66-37-61
Majchrzak K.
Sugita Y.[7]
6-06-3
Matusevich A.
Ymer M.[5]
6-37-5
Mcdonald M.
Hoang A.
6-46-2
Zhang Z.
Seppi A.[3]
7-616-4
Mchugh A.
Kukushkin M.[6]
7-646-4
Bolt A.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-26-4
Clarke J.
Cressy M.
7-56-787-64
Kudla D.
Anderson K.[4]
7-51-66-3
Fabbiano T.
Nakashima B.
4-67-606-3