Marius Copil vs Borna Gojo — Nottingham 2 CH Qualifying Round 2
Nottingham 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 June 2021
grass
CRO#168ATP
1683ELO
1468Grass ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Copil M.6-4 7-5
Gojo B.
Copil M.
672
Gojo B.
450
Marius Copil defeated Borna Gojo 6-4 7-5 in the Nottingham 2 CH qualifying round 2 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Borna Gojo came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, but Marius Copil had arrived on a 3-match winning run. Marius Copil claimed a first win over Borna Gojo in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.
Key context
- Match story: Marius Copil edged Borna Gojo in two tight sets (6–4 7–5).
Head to head
0–1| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-10 | Florence | Q1 | hard | Borna Gojo | 6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(2) |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
67%
Return points won·Even
35%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
66%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.3
10.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.8
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (154 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Umpiry Score
Pre-match6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limitedForm & Matchup
5.0
H2H5.0
7.3
Surface form7.03-match win streak
Win streak0.0
Fatigue & Travel
2.9
Minutes 14d4.0
4.0
3-set count0.0
8.0
Prev. match7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Conditions
Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Bolt A.[7]
Ebden M.
6-33-0
Copil M.
Gojo B.
6-47-5
Escobedo E.[5]
Zhang Z.[2]
6-37-65
Ramanathan R.[8]
Zuk K.[1]
6-36-776-1