Benjamin Bonzi vs Marius Copil — Nottingham 2 CH Round of 32

Nottingham 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Benjamin Bonzi
FRA
Benjamin Bonzi
#93ATP
1749ELO
1678Grass ELO
$396kYTD
$4.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 June 2021
grass
ROU
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Bonzi B.
6-3 6-4
Copil M.
Bonzi B.
662
Copil M.
340

Benjamin Bonzi defeated Marius Copil 6-3 6-4 in the Nottingham 2 CH round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Benjamin Bonzi came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Benjamin Bonzi extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-04-15BucharestQ1clayBenjamin Bonzi6-2 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Bonzi B.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Copil M.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Bonzi B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bonzi B.Copil M.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.7
8.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 154). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bonzi B.Copil M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
64
47
Break points saved·Slight edge
96
91
Break points won·Clear edge
27
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
77
63
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
90
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bonzi B.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Copil M.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
Surface form
7.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
2.9
4.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
3.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bonzi B.Copil M.
Freshness·
91
—

Bonzi B.: 9 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bolt A.
Majchrzak K.
4-66-46-3
Semi-finals
Majchrzak K.
Bonzi B.
6-36-2
Bolt A.
Mcdonald M.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Bolt A.
Gasquet R.[1]
6-36-791-0
Bonzi B.
Dzumhur D.
7-616-2
Majchrzak K.
Kudla D.
6-766-46-4
Mcdonald M.
Matusevich A.
6-26-3
R16
Mcdonald M.
Zhang Z.
6-46-736-4
Dzumhur D.
Kwon S.[2]
6-46-736-2
Bonzi B.
Escobedo E.
7-6106-1
Kudla D.
Gaio F.
4-66-36-2
Majchrzak K.
Ramanathan R.
6-46-3
Matusevich A.
Fabbiano T.
7-6106-4
Bolt A.
Mchugh A.
6-756-46-4
Gasquet R.[1]
Clarke J.
6-26-3
R32
Gasquet R.[1]
Soeda G.
6-46-2
Kwon S.[2]
Machac T.
3-66-36-4
Dzumhur D.
Donskoy E.
7-646-2
Bonzi B.
Copil M.
6-36-4
Escobedo E.
Uchiyama Y.[8]
4-67-57-66
Gaio F.
Polmans M.
6-47-67
Ramanathan R.
Mayer L.
3-66-37-61
Majchrzak K.
Sugita Y.[7]
6-06-3
Matusevich A.
Ymer M.[5]
6-37-5
Mcdonald M.
Hoang A.
6-46-2
Zhang Z.
Seppi A.[3]
7-616-4
Mchugh A.
Kukushkin M.[6]
7-646-4
Bolt A.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-26-4
Clarke J.
Cressy M.
7-56-787-64
Kudla D.
Anderson K.[4]
7-51-66-3
Fabbiano T.
Nakashima B.
4-67-606-3