Gianluca Mager vs Sebastian Baez — Prostejov CH Round of 16

Prostejov CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ITA3
Gianluca Mager
#1223ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 June 2021
clay
Sebastian Baez
ARG
Sebastian Baez
#56ATP
1759ELO
1718Clay ELO
$924kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWW
Mager G.
7-6 6-2
Baez S.
Mager G.
71062
Baez S.
6820

Gianluca Mager defeated Sebastian Baez 7-6 6-2 in the Prostejov CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Sebastian Baez came in ranked #56.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mager G.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Baez S.

Baez S.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Mager G.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Mager G.Baez S.
—
Serve
7
—
Return
43

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Mager G.Baez S.
1st serve in·Clear edge
58%
72%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.9
2.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mager G.Baez S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
40
87
Break points saved·Slight edge
86
96
Break points won·Dominant
4
86
Deciding sets·Clear edge
66
88
Tiebreaks·Dominant
40
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mager G.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Baez S.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
7.8
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
2.0
4.0
3-set count
0.0
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mager G.Baez S.
Freshness·
—
100

Baez S.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Coria F.[4]
Molcan A.
7-616-3
Semi-finals
Coria F.[4]
Kolar Z.
6-46-2
Molcan A.
Mager G.[3]
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Kolar Z.
Kamke T.
6-26-3
Coria F.[4]
Rola B.[8]
6-46-1
Mager G.[3]
Svrcina D.
6-36-2
Molcan A.
Dellien H.[5]
6-36-1
R16
Kolar Z.
Kopriva V.
6-37-63
Coria F.[4]
Kuznetsov A.
6-707-56-2
Rola B.[8]
Klein L.
6-43-67-66
Svrcina D.
Erler A.
6-17-5
Mager G.[3]
Baez S.
7-686-2
Dellien H.[5]
Vrbensky M.
6-16-2
Molcan A.
Watanuki Y.
6-16-2
Kamke T.
Vesely J.[2]
6-36-4
R32
Kamke T.
Mansouri S.
6-03-66-2
Kolar Z.
Miedler L.
6-26-2
Kopriva V.
Kovalik J.[6]
2-67-646-4
Coria F.[4]
Haerteis J.
6-16-0
Kuznetsov A.
Sels J.
6-07-64
Klein L.
Lehecka J.
7-57-5
Rola B.[8]
Rybakov A.
6-17-5
Svrcina D.
Bachinger M.
2-66-06-1
Baez S.
Siniakov D.
6-16-0
Mager G.[3]
Forejtek J.
6-36-3
Dellien H.[5]
Paulson A.
6-16-3
Vrbensky M.
Oliveira G.
6-32-66-4
Molcan A.
Poljak D.
6-36-3
Watanuki Y.
Andujar P.[1]
1-66-16-4
Vesely J.[2]
Mena F.
6-27-65
Erler A.
Cerundolo J.[7]
7-614-2