Jordan Thompson vs Guido Pella — Stuttgart Round of 32

Stuttgart · ATP · Round of 32
Jordan Thompson
AUS
Jordan Thompson
#156ATP
1772ELO
1709Grass ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 June 2021
grass
ARG
Guido Pella
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWL
Thompson J.
6-3 6-4
Pella G.
Thompson J.
662
Pella G.
340

Jordan Thompson defeated Guido Pella 6-3 6-4 in the Stuttgart round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Jordan Thompson came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Jordan Thompson extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-08-23Winston-SalemR64hardJordan Thompson6-1 1-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Pella G.

Pella G.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Serve advantage — Thompson J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Pella G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.2
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.3
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 48). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Pella G.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
70
64
Break points saved·Even
97
95
Break points won·Slight edge
24
35
Deciding sets·Slight edge
91
85
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
58

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Thompson J.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Pella G.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
6.5
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
6.4
7.0
3-set count
4.0
0.0
Prev. match
6.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cilic M.
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
7-626-3
Semi-finals
Cilic M.
Rodionov J.[5]
6-31-0
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
Querrey S.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
Humbert U.[6]
7-657-68
Querrey S.
Stricker D.
6-747-646-3
Rodionov J.[5]
De Minaur A.[4]
3-66-37-64
Cilic M.
Shapovalov D.[1]
7-57-63
R16
Stricker D.
Hurkacz H.[2]
7-657-65
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
Harris L.
6-37-64
Rodionov J.[5]
Gojowczyk P.
5-3
Querrey S.
Duckworth J.
6-47-67
Cilic M.
Basilashvili N.[3]
6-36-2
De Minaur A.[4]
Thompson J.
6-786-36-4
Shapovalov D.[1]
Lopez F.
6-26-726-3
Humbert U.[6]
Hanfmann Y.
7-696-2
R32
Basilashvili N.[3]
Brown D.
6-37-64
Hanfmann Y.
Chardy J.
6-46-4
Humbert U.[6]
Fucsovics M.
6-36-1
Stricker D.
Albot R.
7-647-65
Cilic M.
Molleker R.
7-56-3
Duckworth J.
Mannarino A.[7]
6-36-2
Harris L.
Simon G.
6-47-5
Gojowczyk P.
Ivashka I.
5-76-46-2
Rodionov J.[5]
Koepfer D.
2-66-36-2
Thompson J.
Pella G.
6-36-4
Lopez F.
Popyrin A.
6-46-4
Querrey S.
Celikbilek A.
6-46-1