Alex De Minaur vs Jordan Thompson — Stuttgart Round of 16

Stuttgart · ATP · Round of 16
Alex De Minaur
AUS4
Alex De Minaur
#5ATP
1961ELO
1834Grass ELO
$2.4MYTD
$25MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 June 2021
grass
Jordan Thompson
AUS
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1709Grass ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
De Minaur A.
6-7 6-3 6-4
Thompson J.
De Minaur A.
68662
Thompson J.
710341

Alex De Minaur defeated Jordan Thompson 6-7 6-3 6-4 in the Stuttgart round of 16 on grass. The result followed the form book — Alex De Minaur came in ranked #5, leading the head-to-head 4–1. Alex De Minaur extended the head-to-head to 5–1.

Key context

Head to head

4–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-08-26US OpenR16hardAlex De Minaur6-0 3-6 6-3 7-5
2022-03-21Miami MastersR64hardAlex De Minaur6-2 6-3
2019-06-10s HertogenboschQFgrassJordan Thompson4-6 6-2 6-3
2019-01-07SydneyQFhardAlex De Minaur7-6(4) 6-3
2018-12-31BrisbaneR16hardAlex De Minaur6-4 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
De Minaur A.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Thompson J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs De Minaur A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
De Minaur A.Thompson J.
1st serve in·Even
56%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
54%
Service points won·Even
65%
66%
Return points won·Even
41%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.2
7.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
1.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Minaur A.Thompson J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
95
70
Break points saved·Even
99
97
Break points won·Dominant
97
24
Deciding sets·Slight edge
97
91
Tiebreaks·Even
99
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Minaur A.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Thompson J.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
6.5+125 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.5Grass Elo 1709
7.6Overall Elo 1961
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1772
0.0
H2H
10.0
7.8
Surface form
5.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Minutes 14d
7.4
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
0.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
De Minaur A.Thompson J.
Freshness·
80
—

De Minaur A.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 34 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cilic M.
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
7-626-3
Semi-finals
Cilic M.
Rodionov J.[5]
6-31-0
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
Querrey S.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
Humbert U.[6]
7-657-68
Querrey S.
Stricker D.
6-747-646-3
Rodionov J.[5]
De Minaur A.[4]
3-66-37-64
Cilic M.
Shapovalov D.[1]
7-57-63
R16
Stricker D.
Hurkacz H.[2]
7-657-65
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
Harris L.
6-37-64
Rodionov J.[5]
Gojowczyk P.
5-3
Querrey S.
Duckworth J.
6-47-67
Cilic M.
Basilashvili N.[3]
6-36-2
De Minaur A.[4]
Thompson J.
6-786-36-4
Shapovalov D.[1]
Lopez F.
6-26-726-3
Humbert U.[6]
Hanfmann Y.
7-696-2
R32
Basilashvili N.[3]
Brown D.
6-37-64
Hanfmann Y.
Chardy J.
6-46-4
Humbert U.[6]
Fucsovics M.
6-36-1
Stricker D.
Albot R.
7-647-65
Cilic M.
Molleker R.
7-56-3
Duckworth J.
Mannarino A.[7]
6-36-2
Harris L.
Simon G.
6-47-5
Gojowczyk P.
Ivashka I.
5-76-46-2
Rodionov J.[5]
Koepfer D.
2-66-36-2
Thompson J.
Pella G.
6-36-4
Lopez F.
Popyrin A.
6-46-4
Querrey S.
Celikbilek A.
6-46-1