Brandon Nakashima vs Mario Vilella Martinez — Nottingham 1 CH Round of 32

Nottingham 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Brandon Nakashima
USA
Brandon Nakashima
#32ATP
1839ELO
1757Grass ELO
$990kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 June 2021
grass
ESP
Mario Vilella Martinez
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
Nakashima B.
6-3 6-2
Vilella Martinez M.
Nakashima B.
662
Vilella Martinez M.
320

Brandon Nakashima defeated Mario Vilella Martinez 6-3 6-2 in the Nottingham 1 CH round of 32 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nakashima B.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Vilella Martinez M.

Vilella Martinez M.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Nakashima B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nakashima B.Vilella Martinez M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
66%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.5
6.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.2
6.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 55). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nakashima B.Vilella Martinez M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
25
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
76
Break points won·Clear edge
13
32
Deciding sets·Dominant
64
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
89
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nakashima B.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Vilella Martinez M.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
6.2
7.0
3-set count
0.0
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nakashima B.Vilella Martinez M.
Freshness·
90
—

Nakashima B.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Tiafoe F.[2]
Kudla D.[6]
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Tiafoe F.[2]
Copil M.
6-36-2
Kudla D.[6]
Majchrzak K.[8]
6-41-67-66
Quarter-finals
Tiafoe F.[2]
Donskoy E.
7-642-66-3
Majchrzak K.[8]
Seppi A.[3]
4-66-26-3
Kudla D.[6]
Evans D.[1]
6-41-66-4
Copil M.
Anderson K.[4]
7-647-69
R16
Tiafoe F.[2]
Marchenko I.
7-57-65
Copil M.
Ofner S.
6-46-4
Majchrzak K.[8]
Vukic A.
5-77-6106-4
Seppi A.[3]
Hoang A.
6-46-746-2
Kudla D.[6]
Broady L.
3-66-37-62
Anderson K.[4]
Rosol L.
6-36-4
Donskoy E.
Nakashima B.
7-637-62
Evans D.[1]
Ebden M.
7-667-64
R32
Majchrzak K.[8]
Gunneswaran P.
6-00-0
Donskoy E.
Mcdonald M.[5]
6-37-5
Anderson K.[4]
Clarke J.
6-37-60
Rosol L.
Cressy M.
6-46-756-3
Ofner S.
Gojo B.
6-36-7107-66
Copil M.
Dzumhur D.[7]
6-44-66-1
Kudla D.[6]
Machac T.
6-34-66-4
Ebden M.
Peniston R.
6-46-4
Evans D.[1]
Kokkinakis T.
4-67-617-65
Broady L.
Bolt A.
7-53-66-3
Tiafoe F.[2]
Huesler M.
6-36-4
Marchenko I.
Gaio F.
6-26-3
Nakashima B.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-36-2
Hoang A.
Fabbiano T.
7-657-63
Vukic A.
Polmans M.
7-6104-66-3
Seppi A.[3]
Zhang Z.
7-646-2