Frances Tiafoe vs Illya Marchenko — Nottingham 1 CH Round of 16

Nottingham 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Frances Tiafoe
USA2
Frances Tiafoe
#17ATP
1918ELO
1823Grass ELO
$1.9MYTD
$18MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 June 2021
grass
UKR
Illya Marchenko
#1740ATP
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Tiafoe F.
7-5 7-6
Marchenko I.
Tiafoe F.
7772
Marchenko I.
5650

Frances Tiafoe defeated Illya Marchenko 7-5 7-6 in the Nottingham 1 CH round of 16 on grass. The result followed the form book — Frances Tiafoe came in ranked #17.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tiafoe F.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Marchenko I.

Marchenko I.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Tiafoe F.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tiafoe F.Marchenko I.
1st serve in·Even
59%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.0
5.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tiafoe F.Marchenko I.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
83
13
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
80
Break points won·Dominant
57
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
14
Tiebreaks·Dominant
98
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tiafoe F.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Marchenko I.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
3.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
6.2
7.0
3-set count
4.0
4.0
Prev. match
9.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tiafoe F.Marchenko I.
Freshness·
82
—

Tiafoe F.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Tiafoe F.[2]
Kudla D.[6]
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Tiafoe F.[2]
Copil M.
6-36-2
Kudla D.[6]
Majchrzak K.[8]
6-41-67-66
Quarter-finals
Tiafoe F.[2]
Donskoy E.
7-642-66-3
Majchrzak K.[8]
Seppi A.[3]
4-66-26-3
Kudla D.[6]
Evans D.[1]
6-41-66-4
Copil M.
Anderson K.[4]
7-647-69
R16
Tiafoe F.[2]
Marchenko I.
7-57-65
Copil M.
Ofner S.
6-46-4
Majchrzak K.[8]
Vukic A.
5-77-6106-4
Seppi A.[3]
Hoang A.
6-46-746-2
Kudla D.[6]
Broady L.
3-66-37-62
Anderson K.[4]
Rosol L.
6-36-4
Donskoy E.
Nakashima B.
7-637-62
Evans D.[1]
Ebden M.
7-667-64
R32
Majchrzak K.[8]
Gunneswaran P.
6-00-0
Donskoy E.
Mcdonald M.[5]
6-37-5
Anderson K.[4]
Clarke J.
6-37-60
Rosol L.
Cressy M.
6-46-756-3
Ofner S.
Gojo B.
6-36-7107-66
Copil M.
Dzumhur D.[7]
6-44-66-1
Kudla D.[6]
Machac T.
6-34-66-4
Ebden M.
Peniston R.
6-46-4
Evans D.[1]
Kokkinakis T.
4-67-617-65
Broady L.
Bolt A.
7-53-66-3
Tiafoe F.[2]
Huesler M.
6-36-4
Marchenko I.
Gaio F.
6-26-3
Nakashima B.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-36-2
Hoang A.
Fabbiano T.
7-657-63
Vukic A.
Polmans M.
7-6104-66-3
Seppi A.[3]
Zhang Z.
7-646-2