Kamil Majchrzak vs Andreas Seppi — Nottingham 1 CH Quarter-final

Nottingham 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Kamil Majchrzak
POL8
Kamil Majchrzak
#66ATP
1801ELO
1757Grass ELO
$617kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
30 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 June 2021
grass
ITA3
Andreas Seppi
42 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWW
Majchrzak K.
4-6 6-2 6-3
Seppi A.
Majchrzak K.
4662
Seppi A.
6231

Kamil Majchrzak defeated Andreas Seppi 4-6 6-2 6-3 in the Nottingham 1 CH quarter-final on grass. Kamil Majchrzak extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-01-17Australian OpenR128hardKamil Majchrzak6-1 6-1 7-5
2017-06-26AntalyaR32grassAndreas Seppi6-2 7-6(1)

Serve vs return

This season
Majchrzak K.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Seppi A.

Seppi A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Majchrzak K.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Majchrzak K.Seppi A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
65%
61%
Aces / match·Even
5.4
5.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.7
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 85). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Majchrzak K.Seppi A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
68
53
Break points saved·Even
97
94
Break points won·Slight edge
51
45
Deciding sets·Slight edge
73
63
Tiebreaks·Dominant
75
32

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Majchrzak K.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Seppi A.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
5.5
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
5.5
4.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
2.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Majchrzak K.Seppi A.
Freshness·
92
—

Majchrzak K.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Tiafoe F.[2]
Kudla D.[6]
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Tiafoe F.[2]
Copil M.
6-36-2
Kudla D.[6]
Majchrzak K.[8]
6-41-67-66
Quarter-finals
Tiafoe F.[2]
Donskoy E.
7-642-66-3
Majchrzak K.[8]
Seppi A.[3]
4-66-26-3
Kudla D.[6]
Evans D.[1]
6-41-66-4
Copil M.
Anderson K.[4]
7-647-69
R16
Tiafoe F.[2]
Marchenko I.
7-57-65
Copil M.
Ofner S.
6-46-4
Majchrzak K.[8]
Vukic A.
5-77-6106-4
Seppi A.[3]
Hoang A.
6-46-746-2
Kudla D.[6]
Broady L.
3-66-37-62
Anderson K.[4]
Rosol L.
6-36-4
Donskoy E.
Nakashima B.
7-637-62
Evans D.[1]
Ebden M.
7-667-64
R32
Majchrzak K.[8]
Gunneswaran P.
6-00-0
Donskoy E.
Mcdonald M.[5]
6-37-5
Anderson K.[4]
Clarke J.
6-37-60
Rosol L.
Cressy M.
6-46-756-3
Ofner S.
Gojo B.
6-36-7107-66
Copil M.
Dzumhur D.[7]
6-44-66-1
Kudla D.[6]
Machac T.
6-34-66-4
Ebden M.
Peniston R.
6-46-4
Evans D.[1]
Kokkinakis T.
4-67-617-65
Broady L.
Bolt A.
7-53-66-3
Tiafoe F.[2]
Huesler M.
6-36-4
Marchenko I.
Gaio F.
6-26-3
Nakashima B.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-36-2
Hoang A.
Fabbiano T.
7-657-63
Vukic A.
Polmans M.
7-6104-66-3
Seppi A.[3]
Zhang Z.
7-646-2