Denis Kudla vs Kamil Majchrzak — Nottingham 1 CH Semi-final

Nottingham 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
USA6
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 June 2021
grass
Kamil Majchrzak
POL8
Kamil Majchrzak
#66ATP
1801ELO
1757Grass ELO
$617kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
30 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWLW
Kudla D.
6-4 1-6 7-6
Majchrzak K.
Kudla D.
61782
Majchrzak K.
46661

Denis Kudla defeated Kamil Majchrzak 6-4 1-6 7-6 in the Nottingham 1 CH semi-final on grass.

Key context

  • Match story: Denis Kudla closed it out in three sets, 6–4 1–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kudla D.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Majchrzak K.

Majchrzak K.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kudla D.Majchrzak K.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
65%
Aces / match·Even
5.6
5.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kudla D.Majchrzak K.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
50
68
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
97
Break points won·Dominant
19
51
Deciding sets·Slight edge
81
73
Tiebreaks·Dominant
30
75

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kudla D.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Majchrzak K.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
6.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
6.8
7.0
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kudla D.Majchrzak K.
Freshness·
—
92

Majchrzak K.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Tiafoe F.[2]
Kudla D.[6]
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Tiafoe F.[2]
Copil M.
6-36-2
Kudla D.[6]
Majchrzak K.[8]
6-41-67-66
Quarter-finals
Tiafoe F.[2]
Donskoy E.
7-642-66-3
Majchrzak K.[8]
Seppi A.[3]
4-66-26-3
Kudla D.[6]
Evans D.[1]
6-41-66-4
Copil M.
Anderson K.[4]
7-647-69
R16
Tiafoe F.[2]
Marchenko I.
7-57-65
Copil M.
Ofner S.
6-46-4
Majchrzak K.[8]
Vukic A.
5-77-6106-4
Seppi A.[3]
Hoang A.
6-46-746-2
Kudla D.[6]
Broady L.
3-66-37-62
Anderson K.[4]
Rosol L.
6-36-4
Donskoy E.
Nakashima B.
7-637-62
Evans D.[1]
Ebden M.
7-667-64
R32
Majchrzak K.[8]
Gunneswaran P.
6-00-0
Donskoy E.
Mcdonald M.[5]
6-37-5
Anderson K.[4]
Clarke J.
6-37-60
Rosol L.
Cressy M.
6-46-756-3
Ofner S.
Gojo B.
6-36-7107-66
Copil M.
Dzumhur D.[7]
6-44-66-1
Kudla D.[6]
Machac T.
6-34-66-4
Ebden M.
Peniston R.
6-46-4
Evans D.[1]
Kokkinakis T.
4-67-617-65
Broady L.
Bolt A.
7-53-66-3
Tiafoe F.[2]
Huesler M.
6-36-4
Marchenko I.
Gaio F.
6-26-3
Nakashima B.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-36-2
Hoang A.
Fabbiano T.
7-657-63
Vukic A.
Polmans M.
7-6104-66-3
Seppi A.[3]
Zhang Z.
7-646-2