Mitchell Krueger vs Jack Sock — Orlando 2 CH Round of 32

Orlando 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Mitchell Krueger
USA8
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 June 2021
hard
USA
Jack Sock
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Krueger M.
6-2 7-5
Sock J.
Krueger M.
672
Sock J.
250

Mitchell Krueger defeated Jack Sock 6-2 7-5 in the Orlando 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Krueger M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Sock J.

Sock J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Krueger M.Sock J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
6.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 98). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Krueger M.Sock J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
16
67
Break points saved·Slight edge
87
96
Break points won·Clear edge
14
28
Deciding sets·Dominant
13
86
Tiebreaks·Dominant
0
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Krueger M.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sock J.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.2
Surface form
8.4
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.8
Minutes 14d
2.9
0.0
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Krueger M.Sock J.
Freshness·
100
—

Krueger M.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Eubanks C.
Mejia N.
2-67-636-4
Semi-finals
Mejia N.
Aragone J.
1-67-616-0
Eubanks C.
Riffice S.
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Mejia N.
Brooksby J.[3]
W/O
Eubanks C.
Jarry N.
6-37-5
Riffice S.
Blanch U.
6-17-5
Aragone J.
Gomez E.[5]
6-47-5
R16
Jarry N.
Polansky P.
6-36-3
Riffice S.
Cid R.
6-26-2
Blanch U.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-653-66-2
Mejia N.
Andreozzi G.[7]
7-56-3
Brooksby J.[3]
Kubler J.
6-36-1
Aragone J.
Tirante T.
6-37-5
Gomez E.[5]
Harrison C.
6-36-3
Eubanks C.
Krueger M.[8]
7-657-63
R32
Krueger M.[8]
Sock J.
6-27-5
Jarry N.
Jung J.[2]
6-47-5
Polansky P.
Young D.
6-26-2
Eubanks C.
Ritschard A.
6-36-4
Blanch U.
King K.
6-46-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Escobedo E.[6]
6-47-64
Mejia N.
Mukund S.
6-46-1
Kubler J.
Quiroz R.
7-646-4
Brooksby J.[3]
King D.
7-656-3
Gomez E.[5]
Crawford O.
7-626-746-3
Harrison C.
Moriya H.
6-06-2
Tirante T.
Kozlov S.
6-36-1
Aragone J.
Uchiyama Y.[1]
7-56-2
Riffice S.
Lorenzi P.[4]
6-26-4
Cid R.
Oliveira G.
6-24-2
Andreozzi G.[7]
Kelly D.
4-66-47-5