Ugo Humbert vs Yannick Hanfmann — Stuttgart Round of 16

Stuttgart · ATP · Round of 16
Ugo Humbert
FRA6
Ugo Humbert
#29ATP
1868ELO
1769Grass ELO
$1.1MYTD
$12MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 June 2021
grass
Yannick Hanfmann
GERQ
Yannick Hanfmann
#51ATP
1781ELO
1640Grass ELO
$596kYTD
$4.5MCAREER
34 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLL
Humbert U.
7-6 6-2
Hanfmann Y.
Humbert U.
71162
Hanfmann Y.
6920

Ugo Humbert defeated Yannick Hanfmann 7-6 6-2 in the Stuttgart round of 16 on grass. The result followed the form book — Ugo Humbert came in ranked #29.

Key context

  • Match story: Ugo Humbert closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Humbert U.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Hanfmann Y.

Hanfmann Y.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Humbert U.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Humbert U.Hanfmann Y.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
54%
Service points won·Even
66%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.8
5.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Humbert U.Hanfmann Y.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
70
61
Break points saved·Even
99
95
Break points won·Slight edge
37
26
Deciding sets·Clear edge
78
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
42

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Humbert U.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Hanfmann Y.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.8+128 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.2Grass Elo 1640
5.8Overall Elo 1868
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1781
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.3
Surface form
5.6
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
8.7
7.0
3-set count
7.0
4.0
Prev. match
7.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Humbert U.Hanfmann Y.
Freshness·Even
95
92

Humbert U.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Hanfmann Y.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cilic M.
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
7-626-3
Semi-finals
Cilic M.
Rodionov J.[5]
6-31-0
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
Querrey S.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
Humbert U.[6]
7-657-68
Querrey S.
Stricker D.
6-747-646-3
Rodionov J.[5]
De Minaur A.[4]
3-66-37-64
Cilic M.
Shapovalov D.[1]
7-57-63
R16
Stricker D.
Hurkacz H.[2]
7-657-65
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
Harris L.
6-37-64
Rodionov J.[5]
Gojowczyk P.
5-3
Querrey S.
Duckworth J.
6-47-67
Cilic M.
Basilashvili N.[3]
6-36-2
De Minaur A.[4]
Thompson J.
6-786-36-4
Shapovalov D.[1]
Lopez F.
6-26-726-3
Humbert U.[6]
Hanfmann Y.
7-696-2
R32
Basilashvili N.[3]
Brown D.
6-37-64
Hanfmann Y.
Chardy J.
6-46-4
Humbert U.[6]
Fucsovics M.
6-36-1
Stricker D.
Albot R.
7-647-65
Cilic M.
Molleker R.
7-56-3
Duckworth J.
Mannarino A.[7]
6-36-2
Harris L.
Simon G.
6-47-5
Gojowczyk P.
Ivashka I.
5-76-46-2
Rodionov J.[5]
Koepfer D.
2-66-36-2
Thompson J.
Pella G.
6-36-4
Lopez F.
Popyrin A.
6-46-4
Querrey S.
Celikbilek A.
6-46-1