Sebastian Ofner vs Borna Gojo — Nottingham 1 CH Round of 32

Nottingham 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Sebastian Ofner
AUT
Sebastian Ofner
#125ATP
1713ELO
1635Grass ELO
$345kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 June 2021
grass
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1468Grass ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Ofner S.
6-3 6-7 7-6
Gojo B.
Ofner S.
6610782
Gojo B.
3712661

Sebastian Ofner defeated Borna Gojo 6-3 6-7 7-6 in the Nottingham 1 CH round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Sebastian Ofner came in ranked #125. Sebastian Ofner claimed a first win over Borna Gojo in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Sebastian Ofner closed it out in three sets, 6–3 6–7 7–6.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-01-10Doha Aus Open QualiesQ1hardBorna Gojo6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Ofner S.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Gojo B.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Ofner S.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ofner S.Gojo B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
67%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.0
10.6
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ofner S.Gojo B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
70
53
Break points saved·Even
93
95
Break points won·Dominant
43
10
Deciding sets·Clear edge
82
70
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
84
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ofner S.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Gojo B.
3.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
7.0+167 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.0Grass Elo 1468
5.3Overall Elo 1713
ELO gap
4.7Overall Elo 1683
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
7.5
7.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ofner S.Gojo B.
Freshness·Clear edge
83
100

Ofner S.: 6 days rest · 2 matches, 48 games (7d) · Gojo B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Tiafoe F.[2]
Kudla D.[6]
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Tiafoe F.[2]
Copil M.
6-36-2
Kudla D.[6]
Majchrzak K.[8]
6-41-67-66
Quarter-finals
Tiafoe F.[2]
Donskoy E.
7-642-66-3
Majchrzak K.[8]
Seppi A.[3]
4-66-26-3
Kudla D.[6]
Evans D.[1]
6-41-66-4
Copil M.
Anderson K.[4]
7-647-69
R16
Tiafoe F.[2]
Marchenko I.
7-57-65
Copil M.
Ofner S.
6-46-4
Majchrzak K.[8]
Vukic A.
5-77-6106-4
Seppi A.[3]
Hoang A.
6-46-746-2
Kudla D.[6]
Broady L.
3-66-37-62
Anderson K.[4]
Rosol L.
6-36-4
Donskoy E.
Nakashima B.
7-637-62
Evans D.[1]
Ebden M.
7-667-64
R32
Majchrzak K.[8]
Gunneswaran P.
6-00-0
Donskoy E.
Mcdonald M.[5]
6-37-5
Anderson K.[4]
Clarke J.
6-37-60
Rosol L.
Cressy M.
6-46-756-3
Ofner S.
Gojo B.
6-36-7107-66
Copil M.
Dzumhur D.[7]
6-44-66-1
Kudla D.[6]
Machac T.
6-34-66-4
Ebden M.
Peniston R.
6-46-4
Evans D.[1]
Kokkinakis T.
4-67-617-65
Broady L.
Bolt A.
7-53-66-3
Tiafoe F.[2]
Huesler M.
6-36-4
Marchenko I.
Gaio F.
6-26-3
Nakashima B.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-36-2
Hoang A.
Fabbiano T.
7-657-63
Vukic A.
Polmans M.
7-6104-66-3
Seppi A.[3]
Zhang Z.
7-646-2