Matthew Ebden vs Ryan Peniston — Nottingham 1 CH Round of 32

Nottingham 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Matthew Ebden
38 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 June 2021
grass
Ryan Peniston
GBR
Ryan Peniston
#417ATP
1441ELO
1440Grass ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Ebden M.
6-4 6-4
Peniston R.
Ebden M.
662
Peniston R.
440

Matthew Ebden defeated Ryan Peniston 6-4 6-4 in the Nottingham 1 CH round of 32 on grass.

Key context

  • Match story: Matthew Ebden edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ebden M.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Peniston R.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Ebden M.

Serve advantage — Peniston R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ebden M.Peniston R.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
41%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.6
2.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (48 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ebden M.Peniston R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
45
20
Break points saved·Dominant
86
60
Break points won·Slight edge
32
25
Deciding sets·Clear edge
58
36
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
34
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ebden M.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Peniston R.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 77 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
4.2
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
3.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Tiafoe F.[2]
Kudla D.[6]
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Tiafoe F.[2]
Copil M.
6-36-2
Kudla D.[6]
Majchrzak K.[8]
6-41-67-66
Quarter-finals
Tiafoe F.[2]
Donskoy E.
7-642-66-3
Majchrzak K.[8]
Seppi A.[3]
4-66-26-3
Kudla D.[6]
Evans D.[1]
6-41-66-4
Copil M.
Anderson K.[4]
7-647-69
R16
Tiafoe F.[2]
Marchenko I.
7-57-65
Copil M.
Ofner S.
6-46-4
Majchrzak K.[8]
Vukic A.
5-77-6106-4
Seppi A.[3]
Hoang A.
6-46-746-2
Kudla D.[6]
Broady L.
3-66-37-62
Anderson K.[4]
Rosol L.
6-36-4
Donskoy E.
Nakashima B.
7-637-62
Evans D.[1]
Ebden M.
7-667-64
R32
Majchrzak K.[8]
Gunneswaran P.
6-00-0
Donskoy E.
Mcdonald M.[5]
6-37-5
Anderson K.[4]
Clarke J.
6-37-60
Rosol L.
Cressy M.
6-46-756-3
Ofner S.
Gojo B.
6-36-7107-66
Copil M.
Dzumhur D.[7]
6-44-66-1
Kudla D.[6]
Machac T.
6-34-66-4
Ebden M.
Peniston R.
6-46-4
Evans D.[1]
Kokkinakis T.
4-67-617-65
Broady L.
Bolt A.
7-53-66-3
Tiafoe F.[2]
Huesler M.
6-36-4
Marchenko I.
Gaio F.
6-26-3
Nakashima B.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-36-2
Hoang A.
Fabbiano T.
7-657-63
Vukic A.
Polmans M.
7-6104-66-3
Seppi A.[3]
Zhang Z.
7-646-2