Frances Tiafoe vs Marius Copil — Nottingham 1 CH Semi-final

Nottingham 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Frances Tiafoe
USA2
Frances Tiafoe
#17ATP
1918ELO
1823Grass ELO
$1.9MYTD
$18MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 June 2021
grass
ROU
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Tiafoe F.
6-3 6-2
Copil M.
Tiafoe F.
662
Copil M.
320

Frances Tiafoe defeated Marius Copil 6-3 6-2 in the Nottingham 1 CH semi-final on grass. The result followed the form book — Frances Tiafoe came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Frances Tiafoe extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-07-23AtlantaR32hardFrances Tiafoe6-4 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Tiafoe F.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Copil M.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Tiafoe F.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tiafoe F.Copil M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
53%
Service points won·Even
66%
66%
Return points won·Even
36%
35%
Break points saved·Even
64%
62%
Aces / match·Even
8.0
8.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 154). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tiafoe F.Copil M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
83
47
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
91
Break points won·Dominant
57
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
63
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
98
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tiafoe F.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Copil M.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
4.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
8.4
7.0
3-set count
7.0
4.0
Prev. match
6.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tiafoe F.Copil M.
Freshness·
82
—

Tiafoe F.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Tiafoe F.[2]
Kudla D.[6]
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Tiafoe F.[2]
Copil M.
6-36-2
Kudla D.[6]
Majchrzak K.[8]
6-41-67-66
Quarter-finals
Tiafoe F.[2]
Donskoy E.
7-642-66-3
Majchrzak K.[8]
Seppi A.[3]
4-66-26-3
Kudla D.[6]
Evans D.[1]
6-41-66-4
Copil M.
Anderson K.[4]
7-647-69
R16
Tiafoe F.[2]
Marchenko I.
7-57-65
Copil M.
Ofner S.
6-46-4
Majchrzak K.[8]
Vukic A.
5-77-6106-4
Seppi A.[3]
Hoang A.
6-46-746-2
Kudla D.[6]
Broady L.
3-66-37-62
Anderson K.[4]
Rosol L.
6-36-4
Donskoy E.
Nakashima B.
7-637-62
Evans D.[1]
Ebden M.
7-667-64
R32
Majchrzak K.[8]
Gunneswaran P.
6-00-0
Donskoy E.
Mcdonald M.[5]
6-37-5
Anderson K.[4]
Clarke J.
6-37-60
Rosol L.
Cressy M.
6-46-756-3
Ofner S.
Gojo B.
6-36-7107-66
Copil M.
Dzumhur D.[7]
6-44-66-1
Kudla D.[6]
Machac T.
6-34-66-4
Ebden M.
Peniston R.
6-46-4
Evans D.[1]
Kokkinakis T.
4-67-617-65
Broady L.
Bolt A.
7-53-66-3
Tiafoe F.[2]
Huesler M.
6-36-4
Marchenko I.
Gaio F.
6-26-3
Nakashima B.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-36-2
Hoang A.
Fabbiano T.
7-657-63
Vukic A.
Polmans M.
7-6104-66-3
Seppi A.[3]
Zhang Z.
7-646-2