Lizette Cabrera vs Yafan Wang — Nottingham Round of 64

Nottingham · WTA · Round of 64
AUS
Lizette Cabrera
#299WTA
1453ELO
1434Grass ELO
28 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 June 2021
grass
CHN
Yafan Wang
#358WTA
1704ELO
1540Grass ELO
32 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLW
Cabrera L.
6-3 6-7 6-2
Wang Y.
Cabrera L.
66462
Wang Y.
37721

Lizette Cabrera defeated Yafan Wang 6-3 6-7 6-2 in the Nottingham round of 64 on grass.

Key context

  • Match story: Lizette Cabrera closed it out in three sets, 6–3 6–7 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cabrera L.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Wang Y.

Wang Y.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Cabrera L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cabrera L.Wang Y.
1st serve in·Even
65%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
60%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
46%
Service points won·Even
54%
57%
Return points won·Even
46%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
52%
57%
Aces / match·Even
2.8
2.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (124 vs 97). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cabrera L.Wang Y.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
19
51
Break points saved·Dominant
9
76
Break points won·Slight edge
69
62
Deciding sets·Clear edge
78
65
Tiebreaks·Dominant
7
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cabrera L.
3.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 114 days (−1.5)
Wang Y.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
3.6Grass Elo 1434
Surface ELO
6.4+106 Grass Elo edge
1.8Overall Elo 1453
ELO gap
8.2Overall Elo 1704
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
5.3
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Konta J.[1]
Zhang S.[4]
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Konta J.[1]
Stojanovic N.[15]
6-26-727-5
Zhang S.[4]
Davis L.[14]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Davis L.[14]
Boulter K.
6-762-0
Stojanovic N.[15]
Martincova T.[17]
6-26-4
Zhang S.[4]
Mladenovic K.[7]
3-66-27-64
Konta J.[1]
Van Uytvanck A.[8]
6-37-66
R16
Martincova T.[17]
Garcia Perez G.
6-13-66-2
Zhang S.[4]
Diyas Z.[16]
6-46-2
Boulter K.
Watson H.[9]
7-646-3
Konta J.[1]
Baindl K.
6-21-66-3
Mladenovic K.[7]
Mcnally C.
7-661-66-1
Davis L.[14]
Riske Amritraj A.[2]
6-736-46-4
Stojanovic N.[15]
Vekic D.[3]
6-36-4
Van Uytvanck A.[8]
Golubic V.
6-17-5
R32
Zhang S.[4]
Rodionova A.
6-46-3
Garcia Perez G.
Mchale C.[18]
6-776-47-5
Golubic V.
Ahn K.
6-1
Baindl K.
Brengle M.[13]
6-35-76-3
Vekic D.[3]
Kung L.
7-56-1
Stojanovic N.[15]
Dodin O.
7-647-5
Van Uytvanck A.[8]
Melnikova M.
6-16-1
Boulter K.
Bouzkova M.[4]
6-46-3
Martincova T.[17]
Dolehide C.
6-26-3
Diyas Z.[16]
Cabrera L.
4-66-36-4
Konta J.[1]
Pattinama Kerkhove L.
6-16-3
Riske Amritraj A.[2]
Wang X.
3-67-57-63
Mladenovic K.[7]
Nara K.
6-25-76-2
Watson H.[9]
Moore T.
6-34-66-2
Davis L.[14]
Dart H.
1-66-36-4
Mcnally C.
Hibino N.[12]
6-06-3
R64
Wang X.
Di Giuseppe M.
7-637-62
Boulter K.
Osorio C.
6-26-3
Mcnally C.
Raina A.
6-46-3
Nara K.
Tomova V.
6-46-716-2
Cabrera L.
Wang Y.
6-36-746-2
Dolehide C.
Gatto Monticone G.
6-46-3
Garcia Perez G.
Jones F.
4-66-36-4
Melnikova M.
Volynets K.
6-32-67-66
Ahn K.
Burrage J.
1-66-36-2
Kung L.
Grey S.
6-26-2
Dodin O.
Vandeweghe C.
7-646-4
Rodionova A.
Wang X.
5-77-646-4
Moore T.
Silva E.
6-23-67-63
Dart H.
Raducanu E.
6-36-4
Pattinama Kerkhove L.
Inglis M.
6-16-4
Baindl K.
Gasanova A.
1-66-46-4