Ulises Blanch vs Thai Son Kwiatkowski — Orlando 2 CH Round of 16

Orlando 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Ulises Blanch
#1661ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 June 2021
hard
USA
Thai Son Kwiatkowski
#1589ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLL
Blanch U.
7-6 3-6 6-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Blanch U.
77362
Kwiatkowski T.
65621

Ulises Blanch defeated Thai Son Kwiatkowski 7-6 3-6 6-2 in the Orlando 2 CH round of 16 on hard. Ulises Blanch extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Ulises Blanch closed it out in three sets, 7–6 3–6 6–2.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-07-12NewportQ1grassUlises Blanch2-6 6-2 7-6(5)

Serve vs return

This season
Blanch U.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kwiatkowski T.

Kwiatkowski T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Blanch U.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Blanch U.Kwiatkowski T.
1st serve in·Even
58%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
59%
Aces / match·Even
6.7
6.3
Double faults / match·Even
3.7
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (150 vs 126). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Blanch U.Kwiatkowski T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
19
5
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
65
Break points won·Even
2
6
Deciding sets·Clear edge
19
1
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
37
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Blanch U.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kwiatkowski T.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
4.3
Fatigue & Travel
6.6
Minutes 14d
3.2
7.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Eubanks C.
Mejia N.
2-67-636-4
Semi-finals
Mejia N.
Aragone J.
1-67-616-0
Eubanks C.
Riffice S.
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Mejia N.
Brooksby J.[3]
W/O
Eubanks C.
Jarry N.
6-37-5
Riffice S.
Blanch U.
6-17-5
Aragone J.
Gomez E.[5]
6-47-5
R16
Jarry N.
Polansky P.
6-36-3
Riffice S.
Cid R.
6-26-2
Blanch U.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-653-66-2
Mejia N.
Andreozzi G.[7]
7-56-3
Brooksby J.[3]
Kubler J.
6-36-1
Aragone J.
Tirante T.
6-37-5
Gomez E.[5]
Harrison C.
6-36-3
Eubanks C.
Krueger M.[8]
7-657-63
R32
Krueger M.[8]
Sock J.
6-27-5
Jarry N.
Jung J.[2]
6-47-5
Polansky P.
Young D.
6-26-2
Eubanks C.
Ritschard A.
6-36-4
Blanch U.
King K.
6-46-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Escobedo E.[6]
6-47-64
Mejia N.
Mukund S.
6-46-1
Kubler J.
Quiroz R.
7-646-4
Brooksby J.[3]
King D.
7-656-3
Gomez E.[5]
Crawford O.
7-626-746-3
Harrison C.
Moriya H.
6-06-2
Tirante T.
Kozlov S.
6-36-1
Aragone J.
Uchiyama Y.[1]
7-56-2
Riffice S.
Lorenzi P.[4]
6-26-4
Cid R.
Oliveira G.
6-24-2
Andreozzi G.[7]
Kelly D.
4-66-47-5