Zizou Bergs vs Kimmer Coppejans — Almaty 1 CH Quarter-final

Almaty 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Zizou Bergs
BEL
Zizou Bergs
#35ATP
1808ELO
1696Clay ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 June 2021
clay
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL3
Kimmer Coppejans
#199ATP
1544ELO
1513Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWLWLLW
Bergs Z.
6-3 2-6 6-4
Coppejans K.
Bergs Z.
6262
Coppejans K.
3641

Zizou Bergs defeated Kimmer Coppejans 6-3 2-6 6-4 in the Almaty 1 CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Zizou Bergs came in ranked #35. Zizou Bergs claimed a first win over Kimmer Coppejans in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Zizou Bergs closed it out in three sets, 6–3 2–6 6–4.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-07-03WimbledonQ2grassKimmer Coppejans6-4 7-6(4)

Serve vs return

This season
Bergs Z.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Coppejans K.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bergs Z.Coppejans K.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
42%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.6
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bergs Z.Coppejans K.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
69
44
Break points saved·Dominant
95
67
Break points won·Slight edge
21
29
Deciding sets·Clear edge
92
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bergs Z.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Coppejans K.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.5+183 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.5Clay Elo 1513
8.3Overall Elo 1808
ELO gap
1.7Overall Elo 1544
0.0
H2H
10.0
5.2
Surface form
4.4
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.1
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bergs Z.Coppejans K.
Freshness·Slight edge
82
76

Bergs Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Coppejans K.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Bergs Z.
Skatov T.
4-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Skatov T.
Tseng C.
6-26-3
Bergs Z.
Popko D.[6]
5-76-35-1
Quarter-finals
Skatov T.
Furness E.
4-67-686-4
Bergs Z.
Coppejans K.[3]
6-32-66-4
Popko D.[6]
Martin A.[1]
7-56-3
Tseng C.
Kuzmanov D.
7-616-3
R16
Furness E.
Krstin P.
6-36-1
Skatov T.
Yevseyev D.
1-66-16-4
Kuzmanov D.
Couacaud E.[4]
7-56-0
Tseng C.
Istomin D.[7]
7-676-4
Popko D.[6]
Jianu F.
7-56-3
Martin A.[1]
Schnur B.
6-26-2
Bergs Z.
Menezes J.[8]
6-36-4
Coppejans K.[3]
Moroni G.
2-66-36-1
R32
Krstin P.
Safwat M.[2]
6-46-0
Yevseyev D.
Bonadio R.
6-44-67-5
Skatov T.
Giustino L.[5]
6-43-66-2
Couacaud E.[4]
Sachko V.
6-727-56-2
Kuzmanov D.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-26-4
Istomin D.[7]
Basic M.
3-66-46-2
Menezes J.[8]
Tiurnev E.
6-36-1
Bergs Z.
Barrios Vera T.
2-67-696-3
Moroni G.
Serdarusic N.
7-56-1
Popko D.[6]
Orlov V.
6-26-3
Jianu F.
Gabashvili T.
6-16-3
Schnur B.
Wu T.
6-46-4
Martin A.[1]
Zhukayev B.
6-26-1
Tseng C.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-26-1
Coppejans K.[3]
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-16-2
Furness E.
Gimeno Valero C.
1-66-26-3