Kristie Ahn vs Jodie Burrage — Nottingham Round of 64

Nottingham · WTA · Round of 64
USA
Kristie Ahn
34 yrs · 165 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 June 2021
grass
Jodie Burrage
GBR
Jodie Burrage
#920WTA
1484ELO
1433Grass ELO
27 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Ahn K.
1-6 6-3 6-2
Burrage J.
Ahn K.
1662
Burrage J.
6321

Kristie Ahn defeated Jodie Burrage 1-6 6-3 6-2 in the Nottingham round of 64 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ahn K.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Burrage J.

Burrage J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ahn K.

Serve advantage — Burrage J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ahn K.Burrage J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
60%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
43%
44%
Service points won·Even
54%
57%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Even
54%
52%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.4
4.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.4
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (17 vs 117). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ahn K.Burrage J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
36
9
Break points saved·Even
40
44
Break points won·Even
64
65
Deciding sets·Dominant
62
4
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
59
45

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ahn K.
3.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Burrage J.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 152 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
0.0Lost last 7
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Konta J.[1]
Zhang S.[4]
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Konta J.[1]
Stojanovic N.[15]
6-26-727-5
Zhang S.[4]
Davis L.[14]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Davis L.[14]
Boulter K.
6-762-0
Stojanovic N.[15]
Martincova T.[17]
6-26-4
Zhang S.[4]
Mladenovic K.[7]
3-66-27-64
Konta J.[1]
Van Uytvanck A.[8]
6-37-66
R16
Martincova T.[17]
Garcia Perez G.
6-13-66-2
Zhang S.[4]
Diyas Z.[16]
6-46-2
Boulter K.
Watson H.[9]
7-646-3
Konta J.[1]
Baindl K.
6-21-66-3
Mladenovic K.[7]
Mcnally C.
7-661-66-1
Davis L.[14]
Riske Amritraj A.[2]
6-736-46-4
Stojanovic N.[15]
Vekic D.[3]
6-36-4
Van Uytvanck A.[8]
Golubic V.
6-17-5
R32
Zhang S.[4]
Rodionova A.
6-46-3
Garcia Perez G.
Mchale C.[18]
6-776-47-5
Golubic V.
Ahn K.
6-1
Baindl K.
Brengle M.[13]
6-35-76-3
Vekic D.[3]
Kung L.
7-56-1
Stojanovic N.[15]
Dodin O.
7-647-5
Van Uytvanck A.[8]
Melnikova M.
6-16-1
Boulter K.
Bouzkova M.[4]
6-46-3
Martincova T.[17]
Dolehide C.
6-26-3
Diyas Z.[16]
Cabrera L.
4-66-36-4
Konta J.[1]
Pattinama Kerkhove L.
6-16-3
Riske Amritraj A.[2]
Wang X.
3-67-57-63
Mladenovic K.[7]
Nara K.
6-25-76-2
Watson H.[9]
Moore T.
6-34-66-2
Davis L.[14]
Dart H.
1-66-36-4
Mcnally C.
Hibino N.[12]
6-06-3
R64
Wang X.
Di Giuseppe M.
7-637-62
Boulter K.
Osorio C.
6-26-3
Mcnally C.
Raina A.
6-46-3
Nara K.
Tomova V.
6-46-716-2
Cabrera L.
Wang Y.
6-36-746-2
Dolehide C.
Gatto Monticone G.
6-46-3
Garcia Perez G.
Jones F.
4-66-36-4
Melnikova M.
Volynets K.
6-32-67-66
Ahn K.
Burrage J.
1-66-36-2
Kung L.
Grey S.
6-26-2
Dodin O.
Vandeweghe C.
7-646-4
Rodionova A.
Wang X.
5-77-646-4
Moore T.
Silva E.
6-23-67-63
Dart H.
Raducanu E.
6-36-4
Pattinama Kerkhove L.
Inglis M.
6-16-4
Baindl K.
Gasanova A.
1-66-46-4