Goncalo Oliveira vs Sasi Kumar Mukund — Little Rock CH Round of 16

Little Rock CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
VEN
Goncalo Oliveira
31 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 31 May 2021
hard
IND
Sasi Kumar Mukund
1306ELO
1281Hard ELO
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLL
Oliveira G.
4-6 6-4 6-2
Mukund S.
Oliveira G.
4662
Mukund S.
6421

Goncalo Oliveira defeated Sasi Kumar Mukund 4-6 6-4 6-2 in the Little Rock CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Oliveira G.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Mukund S.

Mukund S.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Oliveira G.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Oliveira G.Mukund S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.7
5.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (136 vs 169). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Oliveira G.Mukund S.
Clutch Rating·Even
0
0
Break points saved·Dominant
64
20
Break points won·Even
4
5
Deciding sets·Clear edge
1
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
56

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Oliveira G.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Mukund S.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.8
Surface form
5.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
4.9
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Sock J.
Gomez E.[3]
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Gomez E.[3]
Oliveira G.
6-46-2
Sock J.
Krueger M.[5]
6-41-66-3
Quarter-finals
Oliveira G.
Crawford O.
1-67-52-0
Gomez E.[3]
Blanch U.
6-26-0
Sock J.
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
6-737-656-4
Krueger M.[5]
Jung J.[1]
3-66-26-1
R16
Gomez E.[3]
Galarneau A.
6-46-4
Crawford O.
Kelly D.
6-46-1
Oliveira G.
Mukund S.
4-66-46-2
Blanch U.
Eubanks C.[8]
6-47-64
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
Ritschard A.
5-76-36-2
Krueger M.[5]
King D.
6-36-2
Jung J.[1]
Moriya H.
6-36-4
Sock J.
Escobedo E.[4]
6-777-697-65
R32
Crawford O.
Polansky P.[9]
7-56-2
Kelly D.
Chappell N.
6-17-5
Oliveira G.
Harrison R.
7-57-66
Mukund S.
Cid R.[7]
6-36-4
Gomez E.[3]
Velotti A.
7-626-3
Eubanks C.[8]
Mejia N.
6-37-63
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
Kozlov S.
6-26-1
Ritschard A.
King K.
7-654-66-4
Escobedo E.[4]
Young D.
6-36-0
Krueger M.[5]
Khan Z.
6-26-4
King D.
Tirante T.
6-46-4
Moriya H.
Jarry N.
6-46-2
Jung J.[1]
Harrison C.
6-16-2
Sock J.
Quiroz R.
6-36-1
Galarneau A.
Aragone J.
6-36-3
Blanch U.
Svajda Z.
5-76-36-3