Nikola Milojevic vs Lukas Lacko — Biella 7 CH Round of 32

Biella 7 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SRB2
Nikola Milojevic
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 May 2021
clay
SVK
Lukas Lacko
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Milojevic N.
6-2 6-3
Lacko L.
Milojevic N.
662
Lacko L.
230

Nikola Milojevic defeated Lukas Lacko 6-2 6-3 in the Biella 7 CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Nikola Milojevic came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Nikola Milojevic extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-06-28WimbledonQ1grassNikola Milojevic6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Milojevic N.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Lacko L.

Lacko L.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Milojevic N.

Serve advantage — Milojevic N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Milojevic N.Lacko L.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
5.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.2
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (142 vs 60). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Milojevic N.Lacko L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
10
26
Break points saved·Dominant
30
86
Break points won·Clear edge
27
8
Deciding sets·Clear edge
11
33
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
27

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Milojevic N.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Lacko L.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
1.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Rune H.
Trungelliti M.
6-35-77-65
Semi-finals
Rune H.
Etcheverry T.
7-52-66-2
Trungelliti M.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-33-66-3
Quarter-finals
Rune H.
Muller A.
6-46-4
Trungelliti M.
Berrettini J.
7-56-3
Meligeni Alves F.
Olivo R.
6-36-3
Etcheverry T.
Zuk K.[6]
6-46-3
R16
Etcheverry T.
Milojevic N.[2]
7-56-3
Zuk K.[6]
Pellegrino A.
7-57-5
Rune H.
Elias G.
6-37-63
Muller A.
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
3-67-636-2
Trungelliti M.
Giustino L.[8]
6-46-2
Berrettini J.
Ramanathan R.
5-76-16-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Klizan M.[7]
6-26-4
Olivo R.
Varillas J.[1]
6-37-61
R32
Milojevic N.[2]
Lacko L.
6-26-3
Etcheverry T.
Janvier M.
4-66-36-0
Pellegrino A.
Ugo Carabelli C.
3-67-56-1
Zuk K.[6]
Brancaccio R.
6-46-2
Elias G.
Cobolli F.
1-66-36-4
Muller A.
Napolitano S.
6-46-1
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
Diez S.
6-37-5
Trungelliti M.
Grenier H.
6-06-2
Ramanathan R.
Kavcic B.
6-16-1
Meligeni Alves F.
Marcora R.
6-36-1
Olivo R.
Menezes J.
6-46-3
Varillas J.[1]
Kolar Z.
6-36-1
Klizan M.[7]
Collarini A.
7-52-66-4
Rune H.
Altmaier D.[3]
6-26-747-65
Giustino L.[8]
Nardi L.
2-66-44-1
Berrettini J.
Petrovic D.[4]
6-12-0