Jack Sock vs Emilio Gomez — Little Rock CH Final

Little Rock CH · CHALLENGER · Final
USA
Jack Sock
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 May 2021
hard
ECU3
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
Sock J.
7-5 6-4
Gomez E.
Sock J.
762
Gomez E.
540

Jack Sock defeated Emilio Gomez 7-5 6-4 in the Little Rock CH final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sock J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Gomez E.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Sock J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sock J.Gomez E.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.3
3.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (98 vs 195). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sock J.Gomez E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
67
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
77
Break points won·Slight edge
28
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
86
23
Tiebreaks·Even
82
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sock J.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Gomez E.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
7.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
4.7
3-set count
0.0
Prev. match
6.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Sock J.
Gomez E.[3]
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Gomez E.[3]
Oliveira G.
6-46-2
Sock J.
Krueger M.[5]
6-41-66-3
Quarter-finals
Oliveira G.
Crawford O.
1-67-52-0
Gomez E.[3]
Blanch U.
6-26-0
Sock J.
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
6-737-656-4
Krueger M.[5]
Jung J.[1]
3-66-26-1
R16
Gomez E.[3]
Galarneau A.
6-46-4
Crawford O.
Kelly D.
6-46-1
Oliveira G.
Mukund S.
4-66-46-2
Blanch U.
Eubanks C.[8]
6-47-64
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
Ritschard A.
5-76-36-2
Krueger M.[5]
King D.
6-36-2
Jung J.[1]
Moriya H.
6-36-4
Sock J.
Escobedo E.[4]
6-777-697-65
R32
Crawford O.
Polansky P.[9]
7-56-2
Kelly D.
Chappell N.
6-17-5
Oliveira G.
Harrison R.
7-57-66
Mukund S.
Cid R.[7]
6-36-4
Gomez E.[3]
Velotti A.
7-626-3
Eubanks C.[8]
Mejia N.
6-37-63
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
Kozlov S.
6-26-1
Ritschard A.
King K.
7-654-66-4
Escobedo E.[4]
Young D.
6-36-0
Krueger M.[5]
Khan Z.
6-26-4
King D.
Tirante T.
6-46-4
Moriya H.
Jarry N.
6-46-2
Jung J.[1]
Harrison C.
6-16-2
Sock J.
Quiroz R.
6-36-1
Galarneau A.
Aragone J.
6-36-3
Blanch U.
Svajda Z.
5-76-36-3