Holger Rune vs Gastao Elias — Biella 7 CH Round of 16

Biella 7 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Holger Rune
DEN
Holger Rune
#81ATP
1757ELO
1729Clay ELO
$0YTD
$16MCAREER
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 May 2021
clay
Gastao Elias
POR
Gastao Elias
#728ATP
1447ELO
1425Clay ELO
35 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
Rune H.
6-3 7-6
Elias G.
Rune H.
6772
Elias G.
3630

Holger Rune defeated Gastao Elias 6-3 7-6 in the Biella 7 CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Holger Rune came in ranked #81.

Key context

  • Match story: Holger Rune closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rune H.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Elias G.

Elias G.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Rune H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rune H.Elias G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
60%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.8
3.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rune H.Elias G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
37
Break points saved·Dominant
99
57
Break points won·Dominant
84
24
Deciding sets·Clear edge
98
86
Tiebreaks·Dominant
99
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rune H.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Elias G.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
9.1+304 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.9Clay Elo 1425
9.2Overall Elo 1757
ELO gap
0.8Overall Elo 1447
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
6.7
Surface form
8.6
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
9.07-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3.7
Minutes 14d
0.4
0.0
3-set count
0.0
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0
2.0
Opponent rise

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Rune H.
Trungelliti M.
6-35-77-65
Semi-finals
Rune H.
Etcheverry T.
7-52-66-2
Trungelliti M.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-33-66-3
Quarter-finals
Rune H.
Muller A.
6-46-4
Trungelliti M.
Berrettini J.
7-56-3
Meligeni Alves F.
Olivo R.
6-36-3
Etcheverry T.
Zuk K.[6]
6-46-3
R16
Etcheverry T.
Milojevic N.[2]
7-56-3
Zuk K.[6]
Pellegrino A.
7-57-5
Rune H.
Elias G.
6-37-63
Muller A.
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
3-67-636-2
Trungelliti M.
Giustino L.[8]
6-46-2
Berrettini J.
Ramanathan R.
5-76-16-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Klizan M.[7]
6-26-4
Olivo R.
Varillas J.[1]
6-37-61
R32
Milojevic N.[2]
Lacko L.
6-26-3
Etcheverry T.
Janvier M.
4-66-36-0
Pellegrino A.
Ugo Carabelli C.
3-67-56-1
Zuk K.[6]
Brancaccio R.
6-46-2
Elias G.
Cobolli F.
1-66-36-4
Muller A.
Napolitano S.
6-46-1
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
Diez S.
6-37-5
Trungelliti M.
Grenier H.
6-06-2
Ramanathan R.
Kavcic B.
6-16-1
Meligeni Alves F.
Marcora R.
6-36-1
Olivo R.
Menezes J.
6-46-3
Varillas J.[1]
Kolar Z.
6-36-1
Klizan M.[7]
Collarini A.
7-52-66-4
Rune H.
Altmaier D.[3]
6-26-747-65
Giustino L.[8]
Nardi L.
2-66-44-1
Berrettini J.
Petrovic D.[4]
6-12-0