Emilio Gomez vs Ulises Blanch — Little Rock CH Quarter-final

Little Rock CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ECU3
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 May 2021
hard
USA
Ulises Blanch
#1661ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWWW
Gomez E.
6-2 6-0
Blanch U.
Gomez E.
662
Blanch U.
200

Emilio Gomez defeated Ulises Blanch 6-2 6-0 in the Little Rock CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez E.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Blanch U.

Blanch U.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gomez E.Blanch U.
1st serve in·Even
60%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.4
6.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (195 vs 150). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gomez E.Blanch U.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
19
Break points saved·Slight edge
77
83
Break points won·Clear edge
19
2
Deciding sets·Even
23
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gomez E.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Blanch U.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.5
Surface form
3.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
4.7
Minutes 14d
7.4
0.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Sock J.
Gomez E.[3]
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Gomez E.[3]
Oliveira G.
6-46-2
Sock J.
Krueger M.[5]
6-41-66-3
Quarter-finals
Oliveira G.
Crawford O.
1-67-52-0
Gomez E.[3]
Blanch U.
6-26-0
Sock J.
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
6-737-656-4
Krueger M.[5]
Jung J.[1]
3-66-26-1
R16
Gomez E.[3]
Galarneau A.
6-46-4
Crawford O.
Kelly D.
6-46-1
Oliveira G.
Mukund S.
4-66-46-2
Blanch U.
Eubanks C.[8]
6-47-64
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
Ritschard A.
5-76-36-2
Krueger M.[5]
King D.
6-36-2
Jung J.[1]
Moriya H.
6-36-4
Sock J.
Escobedo E.[4]
6-777-697-65
R32
Crawford O.
Polansky P.[9]
7-56-2
Kelly D.
Chappell N.
6-17-5
Oliveira G.
Harrison R.
7-57-66
Mukund S.
Cid R.[7]
6-36-4
Gomez E.[3]
Velotti A.
7-626-3
Eubanks C.[8]
Mejia N.
6-37-63
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
Kozlov S.
6-26-1
Ritschard A.
King K.
7-654-66-4
Escobedo E.[4]
Young D.
6-36-0
Krueger M.[5]
Khan Z.
6-26-4
King D.
Tirante T.
6-46-4
Moriya H.
Jarry N.
6-46-2
Jung J.[1]
Harrison C.
6-16-2
Sock J.
Quiroz R.
6-36-1
Galarneau A.
Aragone J.
6-36-3
Blanch U.
Svajda Z.
5-76-36-3