Ulises Blanch vs Christopher Eubanks — Little Rock CH Round of 16

Little Rock CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Ulises Blanch
#1661ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 May 2021
hard
USA8
Christopher Eubanks
#788ATP
1523ELO
1493Hard ELO
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLL
Blanch U.
6-4 7-6
Eubanks C.
Blanch U.
6772
Eubanks C.
4640

Ulises Blanch defeated Christopher Eubanks 6-4 7-6 in the Little Rock CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Blanch U.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Eubanks C.

Eubanks C.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Blanch U.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Blanch U.Eubanks C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
67%
Return points won·Even
36%
33%
Break points saved·Even
64%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.8
10.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.7
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (150 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Blanch U.Eubanks C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
19
50
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
96
Break points won·Even
2
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
19
67
Tiebreaks·Dominant
37
74

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Blanch U.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Eubanks C.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
4.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Sock J.
Gomez E.[3]
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Gomez E.[3]
Oliveira G.
6-46-2
Sock J.
Krueger M.[5]
6-41-66-3
Quarter-finals
Oliveira G.
Crawford O.
1-67-52-0
Gomez E.[3]
Blanch U.
6-26-0
Sock J.
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
6-737-656-4
Krueger M.[5]
Jung J.[1]
3-66-26-1
R16
Gomez E.[3]
Galarneau A.
6-46-4
Crawford O.
Kelly D.
6-46-1
Oliveira G.
Mukund S.
4-66-46-2
Blanch U.
Eubanks C.[8]
6-47-64
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
Ritschard A.
5-76-36-2
Krueger M.[5]
King D.
6-36-2
Jung J.[1]
Moriya H.
6-36-4
Sock J.
Escobedo E.[4]
6-777-697-65
R32
Crawford O.
Polansky P.[9]
7-56-2
Kelly D.
Chappell N.
6-17-5
Oliveira G.
Harrison R.
7-57-66
Mukund S.
Cid R.[7]
6-36-4
Gomez E.[3]
Velotti A.
7-626-3
Eubanks C.[8]
Mejia N.
6-37-63
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
Kozlov S.
6-26-1
Ritschard A.
King K.
7-654-66-4
Escobedo E.[4]
Young D.
6-36-0
Krueger M.[5]
Khan Z.
6-26-4
King D.
Tirante T.
6-46-4
Moriya H.
Jarry N.
6-46-2
Jung J.[1]
Harrison C.
6-16-2
Sock J.
Quiroz R.
6-36-1
Galarneau A.
Aragone J.
6-36-3
Blanch U.
Svajda Z.
5-76-36-3