Filip Cristian Jianu vs Chun Hsin Tseng — Oeiras 4 CH Round of 16

Oeiras 4 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Filip Cristian Jianu
ROU
Filip Cristian Jianu
#282ATP
1387ELO
1362Clay ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 May 2021
clay
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE4
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1541Clay ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
Jianu F.
6-3 3-6 6-1
Tseng C.
Jianu F.
6362
Tseng C.
3611

Filip Cristian Jianu defeated Chun Hsin Tseng 6-3 3-6 6-1 in the Oeiras 4 CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jianu F.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Tseng C.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Jianu F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jianu F.Tseng C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.1
3.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.5
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jianu F.Tseng C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
16
26
Break points saved·Dominant
55
83
Break points won·Dominant
52
15
Deciding sets·Clear edge
13
31
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
1
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jianu F.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Tseng C.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
3.5Clay Elo 1362
Surface ELO
6.5+179 Clay Elo edge
3.7Overall Elo 1387
ELO gap
6.3Overall Elo 1554
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
4.4
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Elias G.
Rune H.
5-76-46-4
Semi-finals
Rune H.
Skatov T.
6-23-66-2
Elias G.
Borges N.
4-67-50-0
Quarter-finals
Skatov T.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
7-645-76-1
Rune H.
Gimeno Valero C.[6]
6-26-4
Borges N.
Jianu F.
6-46-4
Elias G.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-706-36-0
R16
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Wu T.[2]
6-27-62
Skatov T.
Oliveira G.
6-36-1
Gimeno Valero C.[6]
Galovic V.
6-46-2
Borges N.
Yevseyev D.
6-726-46-2
Ugo Carabelli C.
Bonadio R.[8]
4-67-56-4
Elias G.
Araujo P.
7-56-0
Jianu F.
Tseng C.[4]
6-33-66-1
Rune H.
Lenz J.[3]
5-76-46-3
R32
Wu T.[2]
Cacao T.
6-16-1
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Blancaneaux G.
6-36-2
Skatov T.
Sijsling I.
2-66-27-64
Oliveira G.
Cachin P.[7]
6-45-77-61
Lenz J.[3]
Denolly C.
6-46-0
Rune H.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-36-4
Gimeno Valero C.[6]
Sachko V.
6-26-1
Borges N.
Quiroz R.[5]
6-36-0
Yevseyev D.
Serdarusic N.
6-47-5
Jianu F.
Haerteis J.
6-36-0
Tseng C.[4]
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-46-2
Bonadio R.[8]
Forejtek J.
7-643-66-0
Ugo Carabelli C.
De Jong J.
6-46-2
Araujo P.
Bourgue M.[1]
6-26-2
Galovic V.
Ajdukovic D.
4-67-646-1
Elias G.
Faria L.
6-26-3