Pedro Sousa vs Botic Van De Zandschulp — Oeiras 3 CH Round of 16
Oeiras 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 May 2021
clay
#54ATP
1743ELO
1690Clay ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
Sousa P.6-3 6-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Sousa P.
662
Van De Zandschulp B.
320
Pedro Sousa defeated Botic Van De Zandschulp 6-3 6-2 in the Oeiras 3 CH round of 16 on clay.
Key context
- Match story: Pedro Sousa dropped just 5 games past Botic Van De Zandschulp.
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Van De Zandschulp B.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Serve & return on clay
Sousa P.Van De Zandschulp B.
—
Serve
33
—
Return
74
Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.4
5.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
3.9
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (65 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
46
77
Break points saved·Dominant
57
98
Break points won·Clear edge
48
68
Deciding sets·Even
79
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
32
80
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Freshness
Recent loadFreshness·
—
83
Van De Zandschulp B.: 8 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Quarter-finals
Bagnis F.[7]
Borges N.
6-15-77-5
Alcaraz C.
Elias G.
7-56-4
Daniel T.
Dellien H.
6-13-66-1
Gaston H.
Sousa P.[8]
6-31-66-2
R16
Gaston H.
Gomez E.
6-46-3
Borges N.
Martinez P.[4]
6-26-4
Bagnis F.[7]
Ferreira Silva F.
2-66-46-2
Alcaraz C.
Nakashima B.
3-66-46-4
Elias G.
Coria F.[3]
6-44-66-4
Daniel T.
Mayer L.
6-36-4
Sousa P.[8]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-36-2
Dellien H.
Vesely J.[1]
6-34-3
R32
Bagnis F.[7]
Taberner C.
7-53-2
Gomez E.
Johnson S.[2]
7-643-66-3
Gaston H.
Bergs Z.
7-616-1
Van De Zandschulp B.
Kudla D.
6-43-67-5
Martinez P.[4]
Domingues J.
6-46-2
Borges N.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-46-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Jung J.
1-66-46-3
Nakashima B.
Hanfmann Y.[5]
6-36-4
Alcaraz C.
Uchiyama Y.
6-06-3
Elias G.
Cressy M.
7-636-4
Coria F.[3]
Molcan A.
2-66-46-1
Mayer L.
Londero J.[6]
4-66-16-4
Daniel T.
Rola B.
6-17-5
Dellien H.
Ofner S.
6-17-64
Vesely J.[1]
Grenier H.
6-47-62
Sousa P.[8]
Dzumhur D.
3-67-644-0