Anna Karolina Schmiedlova vs Venus Williams — Parma Round of 32

Parma · WTA · Round of 32
SVK
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova
31 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 May 2021
clay
Venus Williams
USA
Venus Williams
1654ELO
1570Clay ELO
46 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Schmiedlova A.
5-7 6-2 6-2
Williams V.
Schmiedlova A.
5662
Williams V.
7221

Anna Karolina Schmiedlova defeated Venus Williams 5-7 6-2 6-2 in the Parma round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Anna Karolina Schmiedlova came in leading the head-to-head 3–1. Anna Karolina Schmiedlova extended the head-to-head to 4–1.

Key context

Head to head

3–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-09-28Roland GarrosR128clayAnna Karolina Schmiedlova6-4 6-4
2020-03-02MonterreyR32hardAnna Karolina Schmiedlova4-6 6-3 6-2
2014-05-26Roland GarrosR64clayAnna Karolina Schmiedlova2-6 6-3 6-4
2014-03-17MiamiR64hardVenus Williams6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Schmiedlova A.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Williams V.

Williams V.serving55% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Schmiedlova A.

Serve advantage — Schmiedlova A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Schmiedlova A.Williams V.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
63%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
37%
Service points won·Even
55%
53%
Return points won·Slight edge
45%
39%
Break points saved·Even
53%
51%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.9
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.4
5.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 37). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Schmiedlova A.Williams V.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
48
54
Break points saved·Dominant
20
83
Break points won·Even
85
83
Deciding sets·Dominant
88
30
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
66
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Gauff C.[3]
Wang Q.[6]
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Gauff C.[3]
Siniakova K.
7-51-66-2
Wang Q.[6]
Stephens S.
6-27-63
Quarter-finals
Siniakova K.
Garcia C.[8]
7-56-1
Stephens S.
Errani S.
6-36-0
Gauff C.[3]
Anisimova A.[5]
6-36-3
Wang Q.[6]
Martic P.[2]
7-643-67-5
R16
Anisimova A.[5]
Schmiedlova A.
6-26-4
Siniakova K.
Williams S.[1]
7-646-2
Errani S.
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
4-67-52-2
Stephens S.
Kasatkina D.[4]
1-66-47-5
Garcia C.[8]
Friedsam A.
6-26-4
Gauff C.[3]
Giorgi C.
6-26-3
Martic P.[2]
Samsonova L.
7-656-3
Wang Q.[6]
Di Giuseppe M.
6-46-4
R32
Gauff C.[3]
Kanepi K.
7-667-67
Schmiedlova A.
Williams V.
5-76-26-2
Samsonova L.
Gatto Monticone G.
6-26-2
Wang Q.[6]
Doi M.
6-25-76-1
Di Giuseppe M.
Hibino N.
7-57-65
Williams S.[1]
Pigato L.
6-36-2
Siniakova K.
Tauson C.
6-16-3
Friedsam A.
Golubic V.
6-46-716-2
Garcia C.[8]
Ormaechea P.
6-46-4
Giorgi C.
Mchale C.
6-746-46-4
Anisimova A.[5]
Paolini J.
6-26-1
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Pera B.
6-46-2
Errani S.
Bogdan A.
7-54-66-1
Stephens S.
Mcnally C.
7-646-4
Martic P.[2]
Gracheva V.
6-46-2
Kasatkina D.[4]
Hsieh S.
6-46-3