Coco Gauff vs Kaia Kanepi — Parma Round of 32

Parma · WTA · Round of 32
Coco Gauff
USA3
Coco Gauff
#7WTA
2071ELO
2018Clay ELO
$2.9MYTD
$33MCAREER
22 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 May 2021
clay
EST
Kaia Kanepi
41 yrs · 181 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLWLW
Gauff C.
7-6 7-6
Kanepi K.
Gauff C.
78792
Kanepi K.
66670

Coco Gauff defeated Kaia Kanepi 7-6 7-6 in the Parma round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Coco Gauff came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Coco Gauff extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-05-23Roland GarrosR32clayCoco Gauff6-3 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Gauff C.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Kanepi K.

Kanepi K.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Gauff C.

Serve advantage — Gauff C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gauff C.Kanepi K.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
48%
42%
Break points saved·Even
56%
53%
Aces / match·Even
3.4
3.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.8
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 100). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gauff C.Kanepi K.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
99
39
Break points saved·Dominant
96
69
Break points won·Dominant
100
70
Deciding sets·Dominant
100
57
Tiebreaks·Dominant
99
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gauff C.Kanepi K.
Freshness·
54
—

Gauff C.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 85 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Gauff C.[3]
Wang Q.[6]
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Gauff C.[3]
Siniakova K.
7-51-66-2
Wang Q.[6]
Stephens S.
6-27-63
Quarter-finals
Siniakova K.
Garcia C.[8]
7-56-1
Stephens S.
Errani S.
6-36-0
Gauff C.[3]
Anisimova A.[5]
6-36-3
Wang Q.[6]
Martic P.[2]
7-643-67-5
R16
Anisimova A.[5]
Schmiedlova A.
6-26-4
Siniakova K.
Williams S.[1]
7-646-2
Errani S.
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
4-67-52-2
Stephens S.
Kasatkina D.[4]
1-66-47-5
Garcia C.[8]
Friedsam A.
6-26-4
Gauff C.[3]
Giorgi C.
6-26-3
Martic P.[2]
Samsonova L.
7-656-3
Wang Q.[6]
Di Giuseppe M.
6-46-4
R32
Gauff C.[3]
Kanepi K.
7-667-67
Schmiedlova A.
Williams V.
5-76-26-2
Samsonova L.
Gatto Monticone G.
6-26-2
Wang Q.[6]
Doi M.
6-25-76-1
Di Giuseppe M.
Hibino N.
7-57-65
Williams S.[1]
Pigato L.
6-36-2
Siniakova K.
Tauson C.
6-16-3
Friedsam A.
Golubic V.
6-46-716-2
Garcia C.[8]
Ormaechea P.
6-46-4
Giorgi C.
Mchale C.
6-746-46-4
Anisimova A.[5]
Paolini J.
6-26-1
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Pera B.
6-46-2
Errani S.
Bogdan A.
7-54-66-1
Stephens S.
Mcnally C.
7-646-4
Martic P.[2]
Gracheva V.
6-46-2
Kasatkina D.[4]
Hsieh S.
6-46-3