Hugo Gaston vs Emilio Gomez — Oeiras 3 CH Round of 16

Oeiras 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Hugo Gaston
FRA
Hugo Gaston
#107ATP
1622ELO
1566Clay ELO
$355kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
25 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 May 2021
clay
ECU
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
Gaston H.
6-4 6-3
Gomez E.
Gaston H.
662
Gomez E.
430

Hugo Gaston defeated Emilio Gomez 6-4 6-3 in the Oeiras 3 CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Hugo Gaston closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gaston H.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Gomez E.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Gaston H.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gaston H.Gomez E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Even
2.9
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 195). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gaston H.Gomez E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
74
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
77
Break points won·Dominant
57
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
23
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
93
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gaston H.Gomez E.
Freshness·
51
—

Gaston H.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 128 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Alcaraz C.
Bagnis F.[7]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Bagnis F.[7]
Gaston H.
6-06-2
Alcaraz C.
Daniel T.
6-25-76-2
Quarter-finals
Bagnis F.[7]
Borges N.
6-15-77-5
Alcaraz C.
Elias G.
7-56-4
Daniel T.
Dellien H.
6-13-66-1
Gaston H.
Sousa P.[8]
6-31-66-2
R16
Gaston H.
Gomez E.
6-46-3
Borges N.
Martinez P.[4]
6-26-4
Bagnis F.[7]
Ferreira Silva F.
2-66-46-2
Alcaraz C.
Nakashima B.
3-66-46-4
Elias G.
Coria F.[3]
6-44-66-4
Daniel T.
Mayer L.
6-36-4
Sousa P.[8]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-36-2
Dellien H.
Vesely J.[1]
6-34-3
R32
Bagnis F.[7]
Taberner C.
7-53-2
Gomez E.
Johnson S.[2]
7-643-66-3
Gaston H.
Bergs Z.
7-616-1
Van De Zandschulp B.
Kudla D.
6-43-67-5
Martinez P.[4]
Domingues J.
6-46-2
Borges N.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-46-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Jung J.
1-66-46-3
Nakashima B.
Hanfmann Y.[5]
6-36-4
Alcaraz C.
Uchiyama Y.
6-06-3
Elias G.
Cressy M.
7-636-4
Coria F.[3]
Molcan A.
2-66-46-1
Mayer L.
Londero J.[6]
4-66-16-4
Daniel T.
Rola B.
6-17-5
Dellien H.
Ofner S.
6-17-64
Vesely J.[1]
Grenier H.
6-47-62
Sousa P.[8]
Dzumhur D.
3-67-644-0