Facundo Bagnis vs Hugo Gaston — Oeiras 3 CH Semi-final

Oeiras 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
ARG7
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 May 2021
clay
Hugo Gaston
FRA
Hugo Gaston
#107ATP
1622ELO
1566Clay ELO
$355kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
25 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
Bagnis F.
6-0 6-2
Gaston H.
Bagnis F.
662
Gaston H.
020

Facundo Bagnis defeated Hugo Gaston 6-0 6-2 in the Oeiras 3 CH semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Hugo Gaston came in ranked #107.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gaston H.

Gaston H.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Serve advantage — Bagnis F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Gaston H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
2.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bagnis F.Gaston H.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
54
74
Break points saved·Even
92
91
Break points won·Clear edge
35
57
Deciding sets·Slight edge
89
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Bagnis F.Gaston H.
Freshness·
—
51

Gaston H.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 128 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Alcaraz C.
Bagnis F.[7]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Bagnis F.[7]
Gaston H.
6-06-2
Alcaraz C.
Daniel T.
6-25-76-2
Quarter-finals
Bagnis F.[7]
Borges N.
6-15-77-5
Alcaraz C.
Elias G.
7-56-4
Daniel T.
Dellien H.
6-13-66-1
Gaston H.
Sousa P.[8]
6-31-66-2
R16
Gaston H.
Gomez E.
6-46-3
Borges N.
Martinez P.[4]
6-26-4
Bagnis F.[7]
Ferreira Silva F.
2-66-46-2
Alcaraz C.
Nakashima B.
3-66-46-4
Elias G.
Coria F.[3]
6-44-66-4
Daniel T.
Mayer L.
6-36-4
Sousa P.[8]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-36-2
Dellien H.
Vesely J.[1]
6-34-3
R32
Bagnis F.[7]
Taberner C.
7-53-2
Gomez E.
Johnson S.[2]
7-643-66-3
Gaston H.
Bergs Z.
7-616-1
Van De Zandschulp B.
Kudla D.
6-43-67-5
Martinez P.[4]
Domingues J.
6-46-2
Borges N.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-46-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Jung J.
1-66-46-3
Nakashima B.
Hanfmann Y.[5]
6-36-4
Alcaraz C.
Uchiyama Y.
6-06-3
Elias G.
Cressy M.
7-636-4
Coria F.[3]
Molcan A.
2-66-46-1
Mayer L.
Londero J.[6]
4-66-16-4
Daniel T.
Rola B.
6-17-5
Dellien H.
Ofner S.
6-17-64
Vesely J.[1]
Grenier H.
6-47-62
Sousa P.[8]
Dzumhur D.
3-67-644-0